Every year (I think), the NRA conducts a nationwide survey of restaurants and publishes the results in a document called the Restaurant Industry Operations Report. In the most recent edition, the median sales per seat for restaurants with average checks of $10-$14.99 was $9,859. I've been using that figure as the basis of RePublic's expected revenue, but one thing about the number bothers me: the median food sales reported by the NRA was 85.4% of total sales, but I'm only expecting food to account for 50% of RePublic's total sales (the NRA considers non-alcoholic beverages to be food, so 'beverage' equals 'alcohol only' throughout this discussion). Common sense suggests that bars without food will typically have far lower sales than $9,859 per seat. Unfortunately, I don't know of any published data that describes the sales of establishments with less than 70% food. I also suspect that sales per seat will drop for restaurants with no alcohol, which should cause a bar/restaurant sales prediction to look something like this:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bfc1/6bfc1c6797bf052ca06620deb662b7881a1707ca" alt=""
I know that one former tavern in town sold about 50% food and generated around $5,500 per seat in annual sales. The place wasn't open seven days a week, though, and I wouldn't describe their operation as "busy". Returning to industry-wide data, the NRA provides five data points that I feel are useful (all for restaurants with average customer checks under $15):
-Median sales per seat (checks of $10-$14.99) = $9,859/yr
-Median food sales (checks of $10-$14.99) = 85.4%
-Median sales per seat, no booze = $8,345/yr
-Maximum reported beverage sales = 27.9%
-Maximum reported beverage sales per seat = $2,500/yr
Assuming the 27.9% and $2,500/yr figures are from the same establishment, the total sales per seat would be $8,961. That allows us to describe three scenarios based on NRA data:
-Sales per seat with 100% food = $8,345/yr.
-Sales per seat with 85.4% food = $9,859/yr.
-Sales per seat with 72.1% food = $8,961/yr.
Using that data, a linear graph can be drawn that looks like this:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/491fa/491fa3fd0f3258c90b250d44300b62af787d8355" alt=""
It's not pretty, but at least it acknowledges that total revenue will depend on the food-to-beverage sales ratio. The result is that RePublic's projected sales per seat would drop from $9,859/yr to $7,469/yr. I'm aware that every market is different, but the raw NRA data should be in the ballpark. Comments from bar/restaurant owners on how I'm interpreting that data, or on sales per seat vs. food/beverage mix in general, would be most welcome!
2 comments:
Joe, isn't the profit margin on beer much higher than the profit margin on food? Especially when you are making the beer. I think profit per seat per year would be a more useful statistic.
--Tony
Hey Tony, no, I'd much rather know sales per seat because profit per seat is based on a lot of factors that will change from business to business. It would be like replacing original gravity with alcohol content in a beer recipe. The NRA reports operating expenses as percentages of revenue as well, so I'd have to figure out revenue per seat either way. Calculating profit from revenue is a lot easier than calculating revenue from profit. If you want to see how I calculate profit, go to http://jwalts.googlepages.com/business and download the 'Financial Model - Brewpub' spreadsheet.
Post a Comment