We spent an even larger sum of money yesterday. Noooo... well, yes. Lawyers aren't the only people who require engagement letters with retainer deposits. We officially teamed up with Destree Design Architects yesterday. Despite working on highly-stylized places like Samba and Fromagination, the folks at Destree are very grounded and approachable. Helping us evaluate locations and design our facility won't be as lucrative as some of their other projects, but they're cool with that.
I spent the last day of 2008 doing something I love: bottling a batch of Belgian Pumpkin Ale. Bottling is ok on a homebrew scale. There, I'm not a hypocrite.
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Big Money
We wrote our first four-figure check today... scary! We've now officially retained a securities lawyer to review our investment offering. Up next: take a few days off to enjoy our families' culinary skills because we can no longer afford food. After that, we'll retain an architect and commence an intensive location search. We practiced this afternoon by checking out an unexpectedly awesome property. As if our spirits weren't high enough, the House Ale tastes fantastic - my experiments with organic ingredients and unfamiliar yeast strains are beginning to pay off in spades. Have a great holiday!
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Holiday Beer
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Radio Radio
Dean Coffey, the brewmaster at Ale Asylum, thinks that anyone who wants to open a brewery in Wisconsin needs their head examined. I think that anyone who wants to run a bottling line needs their head examined. Joking aside, Dean really captured the essence of Wisconsin's Brewpub Bill in this Beer Talk Today interview:
MBR Podcast 12/9/08
Can we still call the bill SB224? I believe the original proposal was sent back to committee due to overwhelming industry opposition. Calling it "the 2007-2009 budget" isn't very descriptive, though.
MBR Podcast 12/9/08
Can we still call the bill SB224? I believe the original proposal was sent back to committee due to overwhelming industry opposition. Calling it "the 2007-2009 budget" isn't very descriptive, though.
Friday, December 5, 2008
More Models
The picture below is of a cold room. My initial sizing estimate, which assumed that 15% of the cold room floor would be empty, didn't have nearly enough space to arrange the tanks and kegs in a usable fashion. The modeling process convinced me to bump the empty floor space to 50%.
The next picture shows a mill room. It's not much to look at, but it was nice to verify that my initial sizing estimate would fit a mill, two pallets of malt and a pallet-wide door path.
I went two for three on my initial sizing estimates. Not bad for my first time!
The next picture shows a mill room. It's not much to look at, but it was nice to verify that my initial sizing estimate would fit a mill, two pallets of malt and a pallet-wide door path.
I went two for three on my initial sizing estimates. Not bad for my first time!
This Year's Model
A 3D model of the brewery, that is!
I was just hoping to make a crude 2D CAD drawing, but I couldn't find any free software for my old Macintosh. Eventually, I stumbled across Google Sketchup. It's totally counter-intuitive if you've used other 3D modeling programs, but I'm getting the hang of it. All I need it for is to quickly estimate whether or not a given space is big enough to house a brewery. I had no trouble fitting the equipment onto an ambiguous rectangle with the same square footage as my sizing estimates, so I've done a good job so far.
I was just hoping to make a crude 2D CAD drawing, but I couldn't find any free software for my old Macintosh. Eventually, I stumbled across Google Sketchup. It's totally counter-intuitive if you've used other 3D modeling programs, but I'm getting the hang of it. All I need it for is to quickly estimate whether or not a given space is big enough to house a brewery. I had no trouble fitting the equipment onto an ambiguous rectangle with the same square footage as my sizing estimates, so I've done a good job so far.
Saturday, November 29, 2008
Short Week
I hope all y'all had a great Thanksgiving! It was a short week for me, both because of the holiday and because I'm running low on things to do. A lot of the near-term tasks are out of my hands: our lawyer is making a few changes to our operating agreement, Jane is updating her bio for the business plan and our real estate agent is searching for buildings. Once the operating agreement is ready, another attorney will review our investment offering for compliance with securities and tax laws. In the meantime, I scheduled meetings with an accountant and an architect - as well as a couple of property showings - for next week.
Jane and I know what architects do in the general sense, but we're pretty clueless about the specifics. We know that Madison won't give us a building permit without facility drawings that are signed by a registered architect or engineer, so we'll probably need to work with one at some point. Some of the things we don't know are when we should start talking with architects, whether or not they can help us evaluate sites, and how we can approach them without sounding like idiots. This website was a huge help:
American Institute of Architects: How Design Works
In other news, my wife is pregnant! Her due date is early June. I could write pages about how excited I am, but that's not why you're here. As far as it relates to the business, it basically means that I'll have to be making money by July. Daycare alone will cost more than my wife's salary will be able to cover. The brewery won't need to be open by July, which isn't remotely possible anyway, but I'll either need to have raised enough money by then to start paying myself or I'll need to get a part-time job. The responsible future parent in me is screaming "get a job now!" while a more optimistic part of my psyche is saying "you're too far along - you'll have to quit any job you take in two months." If I knew what I know now, I'd have looked for a job as soon as I got back from Vermont. I'd be much farther away from opening the pub, but I'd be in better financial shape and I wouldn't feel nearly as weighed down by urgency. How naive was I to think that I'd be renovating a facility several months ago? Am I still being naive in hoping that I can raise $600K and find a location before next summer? Jane could have spent the last year working abroad instead of lingering at a job that she hates. I could have gotten another year of commercial brewing under my belt, or I could have learned to bartend, cook or wait tables. I hope I won't be saying the same things at this time next year.
Jane and I know what architects do in the general sense, but we're pretty clueless about the specifics. We know that Madison won't give us a building permit without facility drawings that are signed by a registered architect or engineer, so we'll probably need to work with one at some point. Some of the things we don't know are when we should start talking with architects, whether or not they can help us evaluate sites, and how we can approach them without sounding like idiots. This website was a huge help:
American Institute of Architects: How Design Works
In other news, my wife is pregnant! Her due date is early June. I could write pages about how excited I am, but that's not why you're here. As far as it relates to the business, it basically means that I'll have to be making money by July. Daycare alone will cost more than my wife's salary will be able to cover. The brewery won't need to be open by July, which isn't remotely possible anyway, but I'll either need to have raised enough money by then to start paying myself or I'll need to get a part-time job. The responsible future parent in me is screaming "get a job now!" while a more optimistic part of my psyche is saying "you're too far along - you'll have to quit any job you take in two months." If I knew what I know now, I'd have looked for a job as soon as I got back from Vermont. I'd be much farther away from opening the pub, but I'd be in better financial shape and I wouldn't feel nearly as weighed down by urgency. How naive was I to think that I'd be renovating a facility several months ago? Am I still being naive in hoping that I can raise $600K and find a location before next summer? Jane could have spent the last year working abroad instead of lingering at a job that she hates. I could have gotten another year of commercial brewing under my belt, or I could have learned to bartend, cook or wait tables. I hope I won't be saying the same things at this time next year.
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Unofficial Accountability Update
Last week was a pretty busy one at RePublic HQ. I met with a couple of commercial Realtors to get the location search rolling, which I believe will be important to our success because bars and restaurants are usually sold without being advertised. Since a restaurant for sale would probably lose huge amounts of business after appearing in a classified ad, it makes sense for its owner to try and conduct the sale by networking through a real estate agent. Whether Jane and I buy an existing business or take over the lease of an already-vacated facility, I think the cost of startup will necessitate that we move into a location with tavern infrastructure in place.
Between meeting with realtors, I met up with a commercial kitchen designer to make sure we're looking for locations in the right size range. The designer I met with was surprised that I contacted him directly because he's usually recruited by architects. His typical role - and I'm simplifying here - is to determine which kitchen equipment will be required to execute a particular foodservice concept, work with a design team (typically coordinated by the project architect) to determine the kitchen layout, and inspect the equipment deliveries to ensure that the terms of purchase were satisfied. The meeting was very helpful, but the location we choose will play a large part in determining whether or not we hire a designer. If we're able to inherit a fully-equipped pub, we probably won't need one. If our eventual location requires an overhaul, hiring a designer would probably be money well-spent. The good news for now is that my sizing estimates were solid.
The hop search took a turn toward urgency as I continued to talk with HopUnion. The dealer told me that most of the varieties I'm looking for are 80% contracted for next year, meaning that 80% of the expected 2009 crop has already been purchased. I plan on committing to a contract next week, after doing a bit of last-minute scrambling to see what else is out there. These will probably be my options:
1. Talk with another US hop dealer to see which organic varieties they expect to have available for contracting. I received a return call from a sales rep last week, but he wasn't around when I called back. If the dealer has what I'm looking for, I'll sign a contract with them.
2. Sign a one-year contract with HopUnion for non-organic hops. The grower I'm buying my 2009 Cascades from expects to plant more varieties next summer. It usually takes a minimum of two years for newly-planted hops to produce worthwhile yields, which means I could be buying all Wisconsin hops by the fall of 2010.
3. Sign a three-year contract with New Zealand Hops for organic varieties that will impart a harsh bitterness to my beer.
I'm optimistically hoping that option #1 bears fruit, but my fallback plan is option #2. Buying organically is one of my long-term goals, but I can't justify the combination of shipping from New Zealand (i.e. trading one environmental benefit for another), committing to buying non-local hops for three years and compromising on my desired specifications. Option #3 was a lot more attractive five months ago when it was my only option.
Jane and I also received some excellent business plan advice from an experienced investor. His general advice was to elaborate more on ourselves (we should be trying to convince people to believe in us as much as our idea), remove tavern management specifics (e.g. menu items and employee policies) so we'll have the flexibility to adapt the business to its customers, and include more local market data (which is admittedly difficult to find). The meeting actually made me excited to revise the business plan, which I plan to do in conjunction with finalizing a hop supply next week. In the back of my mind, I'll be getting ready to ask some architects how they're typically involved in evaluating potential tavern locations.
Between meeting with realtors, I met up with a commercial kitchen designer to make sure we're looking for locations in the right size range. The designer I met with was surprised that I contacted him directly because he's usually recruited by architects. His typical role - and I'm simplifying here - is to determine which kitchen equipment will be required to execute a particular foodservice concept, work with a design team (typically coordinated by the project architect) to determine the kitchen layout, and inspect the equipment deliveries to ensure that the terms of purchase were satisfied. The meeting was very helpful, but the location we choose will play a large part in determining whether or not we hire a designer. If we're able to inherit a fully-equipped pub, we probably won't need one. If our eventual location requires an overhaul, hiring a designer would probably be money well-spent. The good news for now is that my sizing estimates were solid.
The hop search took a turn toward urgency as I continued to talk with HopUnion. The dealer told me that most of the varieties I'm looking for are 80% contracted for next year, meaning that 80% of the expected 2009 crop has already been purchased. I plan on committing to a contract next week, after doing a bit of last-minute scrambling to see what else is out there. These will probably be my options:
1. Talk with another US hop dealer to see which organic varieties they expect to have available for contracting. I received a return call from a sales rep last week, but he wasn't around when I called back. If the dealer has what I'm looking for, I'll sign a contract with them.
2. Sign a one-year contract with HopUnion for non-organic hops. The grower I'm buying my 2009 Cascades from expects to plant more varieties next summer. It usually takes a minimum of two years for newly-planted hops to produce worthwhile yields, which means I could be buying all Wisconsin hops by the fall of 2010.
3. Sign a three-year contract with New Zealand Hops for organic varieties that will impart a harsh bitterness to my beer.
I'm optimistically hoping that option #1 bears fruit, but my fallback plan is option #2. Buying organically is one of my long-term goals, but I can't justify the combination of shipping from New Zealand (i.e. trading one environmental benefit for another), committing to buying non-local hops for three years and compromising on my desired specifications. Option #3 was a lot more attractive five months ago when it was my only option.
Jane and I also received some excellent business plan advice from an experienced investor. His general advice was to elaborate more on ourselves (we should be trying to convince people to believe in us as much as our idea), remove tavern management specifics (e.g. menu items and employee policies) so we'll have the flexibility to adapt the business to its customers, and include more local market data (which is admittedly difficult to find). The meeting actually made me excited to revise the business plan, which I plan to do in conjunction with finalizing a hop supply next week. In the back of my mind, I'll be getting ready to ask some architects how they're typically involved in evaluating potential tavern locations.
Friday, November 14, 2008
How Stupid Is It?
Complaining about the Brewpub Bill is the closest I'll likely get to writing a regular feature on this weblog. Thanks to the bill's existence, RePublic will be required by law to sell other breweries' beer. If Dotty's was suddenly forced to sell another restaurant's burgers, you might ask "how did that other restaurant get so much political influence, and how could our legislators cater to it so shamelessly?"
Since the law doesn't quantify an amount to sell, I assume that I'd need to have an alternative beer available at all times. After exhaustive research and number crunching, I'm projecting that RePublic will sell one six-pack of it per year (rounded up to the nearest six-pack). Yes, that will allow me to have a bottle on-hand for anyone who wants to order one. If I can't find a distributor who's willing to drive to my pub every four years to sell me a case of beer, will the courts force me to stock excess inventory and/or spend money to advertise a beer that I didn't brew?
Changing gears, sort of, an ideal situation would be to have a brewery in the same building as the pub. However, in these tough economic times, it would be far less capital-intensive (i.e. easier to raise the required money) to open a pub in an existing tavern and build an off-site brewery in some inexpensive warehouse space. Until October of last year, we would have had that option. Boo to the Brewpub Bill.
Since the law doesn't quantify an amount to sell, I assume that I'd need to have an alternative beer available at all times. After exhaustive research and number crunching, I'm projecting that RePublic will sell one six-pack of it per year (rounded up to the nearest six-pack). Yes, that will allow me to have a bottle on-hand for anyone who wants to order one. If I can't find a distributor who's willing to drive to my pub every four years to sell me a case of beer, will the courts force me to stock excess inventory and/or spend money to advertise a beer that I didn't brew?
Changing gears, sort of, an ideal situation would be to have a brewery in the same building as the pub. However, in these tough economic times, it would be far less capital-intensive (i.e. easier to raise the required money) to open a pub in an existing tavern and build an off-site brewery in some inexpensive warehouse space. Until October of last year, we would have had that option. Boo to the Brewpub Bill.
Saturday, November 8, 2008
The Hop Report
In the northern hemisphere, hops are typically harvested in September. Earlier in the year, I tried to contract some hops for this year's harvest (i.e. buy them in advance so that my supply would be guaranteed). I was unsuccessful, which ended up being a good thing for two reasons:
1. Opening the pub is going slower than I expected, so I probably won't need hops until after the 2009 harvest.
2. The 2008 crop was better than it was projected to be, so availability is up and prices are down. If I had signed a contract, I would have paid higher prices than the current market value.
I recently talked with Hopunion - the major hop supplier of the craft brewing industry - about contracting some hops for the 2009 harvest. It's looking like I won't have any problems. I could sign a contract right now, but I'm going to hold off for a few months. Doing so will give me a better idea of when I'll need hops, will allow the hop prices stabilize some more, and will give me time to look for organic hops (which Hopunion sells very little of).
Organic hops are tricky. First off, they're difficult to grow. Hops are prone to a variety pests and diseases that thrive in the US and Europe. As such, most of the world's organic hops are grown in New Zealand. Secondly, the number of existing varieties are extremely limited. I've been experimenting with a bittering hop from New Zealand called Pacific Gem, but I haven't been very happy with the results. It lends a harsh bitterness to beer (due to high co-humulone levels, if you must know), which wouldn't be an issue if I used a variety such as Nugget, Magnum, Simcoe or Horizon - none of which are available organically. Traditional styles of beer that depend on specific hop characteristics simply can't be brewed with organic hops because, again, the varieties don't exist. Thirdly, organic hops are expensive. Growing hops without pesticides results in low yields, government certifications cost money, and shipping across the ocean is not cheap.
As a result, most certified organic beers probably don't have a lot of organic hops in them. To receive the standard organic certification from the USDA, 95% of the total ingredients (by weight) need to be certified organic. A typical 7-barrel beer recipe looks something like this:
Malted barley - 500 lbs
Hops - 5 lbs
In the above recipe, hops are less than 1% of the total weight. Even a hoppy pale ale, using the same amount of grain, would probably only have about 10-15 lbs of hops in it. Because hops are such a small amount of the total ingredient weight, certified organic beer can be produced with no organic hops whatsoever. A USDA rule change has been proposed that would require each type of ingredient to be 95% organic by weight, but I don't believe it's been implemented yet.
I do have a source for one organically-grown hop variety - Cascades from Gorst Valley Hops in Mazomanie - but the hops won't be certified. Due to the expense and hassle of certification, a lot of farmers simply don't want to deal with it. James, the Gorst Valley farmer, takes it a step further and claims that an organic certification doesn't ensure that something is organic. He told me an interesting story about visiting a certified organic farm that sprayed chemical pesticides on their crops. They were able to get away with it because the pesticides were in containers that previously held substances that were approved for organic production, and the inspectors didn't look any farther than the labels on the containers. James looks at not certifying his hops as an opportunity to educate people on what sustainable farming is really about.
Still, it seems like a formal certification does a lot for consumer confidence. What do you think? Would you rather buy beer made with non-certified organic hops grown down the road, or would you rather buy beer made with certified organic hops shipped from New Zealand?
1. Opening the pub is going slower than I expected, so I probably won't need hops until after the 2009 harvest.
2. The 2008 crop was better than it was projected to be, so availability is up and prices are down. If I had signed a contract, I would have paid higher prices than the current market value.
I recently talked with Hopunion - the major hop supplier of the craft brewing industry - about contracting some hops for the 2009 harvest. It's looking like I won't have any problems. I could sign a contract right now, but I'm going to hold off for a few months. Doing so will give me a better idea of when I'll need hops, will allow the hop prices stabilize some more, and will give me time to look for organic hops (which Hopunion sells very little of).
Organic hops are tricky. First off, they're difficult to grow. Hops are prone to a variety pests and diseases that thrive in the US and Europe. As such, most of the world's organic hops are grown in New Zealand. Secondly, the number of existing varieties are extremely limited. I've been experimenting with a bittering hop from New Zealand called Pacific Gem, but I haven't been very happy with the results. It lends a harsh bitterness to beer (due to high co-humulone levels, if you must know), which wouldn't be an issue if I used a variety such as Nugget, Magnum, Simcoe or Horizon - none of which are available organically. Traditional styles of beer that depend on specific hop characteristics simply can't be brewed with organic hops because, again, the varieties don't exist. Thirdly, organic hops are expensive. Growing hops without pesticides results in low yields, government certifications cost money, and shipping across the ocean is not cheap.
As a result, most certified organic beers probably don't have a lot of organic hops in them. To receive the standard organic certification from the USDA, 95% of the total ingredients (by weight) need to be certified organic. A typical 7-barrel beer recipe looks something like this:
Malted barley - 500 lbs
Hops - 5 lbs
In the above recipe, hops are less than 1% of the total weight. Even a hoppy pale ale, using the same amount of grain, would probably only have about 10-15 lbs of hops in it. Because hops are such a small amount of the total ingredient weight, certified organic beer can be produced with no organic hops whatsoever. A USDA rule change has been proposed that would require each type of ingredient to be 95% organic by weight, but I don't believe it's been implemented yet.
I do have a source for one organically-grown hop variety - Cascades from Gorst Valley Hops in Mazomanie - but the hops won't be certified. Due to the expense and hassle of certification, a lot of farmers simply don't want to deal with it. James, the Gorst Valley farmer, takes it a step further and claims that an organic certification doesn't ensure that something is organic. He told me an interesting story about visiting a certified organic farm that sprayed chemical pesticides on their crops. They were able to get away with it because the pesticides were in containers that previously held substances that were approved for organic production, and the inspectors didn't look any farther than the labels on the containers. James looks at not certifying his hops as an opportunity to educate people on what sustainable farming is really about.
Still, it seems like a formal certification does a lot for consumer confidence. What do you think? Would you rather buy beer made with non-certified organic hops grown down the road, or would you rather buy beer made with certified organic hops shipped from New Zealand?
Sunday, November 2, 2008
Fun With Labels
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Overlooked Business Advice
If you plan on opening a business that requires outside investment, you'll need to learn about securities laws. This website will get you started:
Small Business and the SEC
If you're in my boat, i.e. you want to privately raise a small amount of money (relative to Microsoft), you'll probably be exempt from having to register your investment offering. If that's the case, you should have around $10,000 on-hand for a lawyer to translate the government regulations into a human language, write your offering documents and prepare any required forms. If that's not the case, you should expect to pay around $40,000 for a non-abridged version of the same services. Just so you know.
Investing is for rich people. No conspiracy theories here - I believe it's a natural consequence of laws that are intended to protect investors - but that doesn't make it any less frustrating for me. Logistics aside, Jane and I would love to raise money from everyday people like ourselves. Unfortunately, exemptions from securities registration (which we can't afford to not qualify for) exist primarily for these types of scenarios:
-Unlimited number of accredited investors. For the most part, accredited investors are people with net worths over $1M and/or who earn over $200K a year.
-X or fewer non-accredited investors. X = 25 for Wisconsin, which (and this is total BS) includes out-of-state investors. This means that if you need to raise $750K, each investor would need to contribute an average of $30K.
-Private offerings only. If this post implied that I was offering you a share of RePublic equity, I'd already be disqualified from this type of exemption.
Now you know something that most introductory business guides don't tell you.
Small Business and the SEC
If you're in my boat, i.e. you want to privately raise a small amount of money (relative to Microsoft), you'll probably be exempt from having to register your investment offering. If that's the case, you should have around $10,000 on-hand for a lawyer to translate the government regulations into a human language, write your offering documents and prepare any required forms. If that's not the case, you should expect to pay around $40,000 for a non-abridged version of the same services. Just so you know.
Investing is for rich people. No conspiracy theories here - I believe it's a natural consequence of laws that are intended to protect investors - but that doesn't make it any less frustrating for me. Logistics aside, Jane and I would love to raise money from everyday people like ourselves. Unfortunately, exemptions from securities registration (which we can't afford to not qualify for) exist primarily for these types of scenarios:
-Unlimited number of accredited investors. For the most part, accredited investors are people with net worths over $1M and/or who earn over $200K a year.
-X or fewer non-accredited investors. X = 25 for Wisconsin, which (and this is total BS) includes out-of-state investors. This means that if you need to raise $750K, each investor would need to contribute an average of $30K.
-Private offerings only. If this post implied that I was offering you a share of RePublic equity, I'd already be disqualified from this type of exemption.
Now you know something that most introductory business guides don't tell you.
Saturday, October 18, 2008
Army of Experts
Before I talk about us, let's talk about them. Regarding the bailout bill, from the Wisconsin Restaurant Association:
As a result of the restaurant industry’s presence on Capitol Hill during these historical proceedings, one of the restaurant industry’s key agenda items was included in the bailout bill. Depreciation for restaurant construction and improvements was accelerated from 39 1/2 years down to 15 years.
I hate that @#$%. Yes, changing the depreciation schedule is good for the restaurant industry. No, the change doesn't hurt anyone else. Yes, I know that sidestepping the legislative process is Standard Operating Procedure for Congress and that people need to play the game to get things done. The loophole works both ways, though - Team Evil is equally capable of attaching unrelated contingents to bills that require urgent passage. That's how Wisconsin's idiotic Brewpub Tourism Development Act got passed last year. I hope the craft brewing community continues to beat that dead horse until brewing companies like Goose Island and Dogfish Head can legally exist in Wisconsin once again. I want that dead horse on television. How awesome would a New Glarus beer hall be, all serving cheese and sausage platters on the grounds of their new production facility?
Anyway, I have a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) written and I'm scheduled to meet with a lawyer next week. I don't know if writing the document myself will make life easier or harder on lawyers, but at least Jane and I will have options. The big reason for seeking legal advice is to determine how our capital needs and various investment-solicitation strategies will affect which securities registration exemptions we'll qualify for. The following week, we'll be meeting with the city's Office of Business Resources to outline the city's involvement in our project. Our business plan's proposed timeline is pretty sad, so hopefully the city will help us straighten it out a bit.
As a result of the restaurant industry’s presence on Capitol Hill during these historical proceedings, one of the restaurant industry’s key agenda items was included in the bailout bill. Depreciation for restaurant construction and improvements was accelerated from 39 1/2 years down to 15 years.
I hate that @#$%. Yes, changing the depreciation schedule is good for the restaurant industry. No, the change doesn't hurt anyone else. Yes, I know that sidestepping the legislative process is Standard Operating Procedure for Congress and that people need to play the game to get things done. The loophole works both ways, though - Team Evil is equally capable of attaching unrelated contingents to bills that require urgent passage. That's how Wisconsin's idiotic Brewpub Tourism Development Act got passed last year. I hope the craft brewing community continues to beat that dead horse until brewing companies like Goose Island and Dogfish Head can legally exist in Wisconsin once again. I want that dead horse on television. How awesome would a New Glarus beer hall be, all serving cheese and sausage platters on the grounds of their new production facility?
Anyway, I have a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) written and I'm scheduled to meet with a lawyer next week. I don't know if writing the document myself will make life easier or harder on lawyers, but at least Jane and I will have options. The big reason for seeking legal advice is to determine how our capital needs and various investment-solicitation strategies will affect which securities registration exemptions we'll qualify for. The following week, we'll be meeting with the city's Office of Business Resources to outline the city's involvement in our project. Our business plan's proposed timeline is pretty sad, so hopefully the city will help us straighten it out a bit.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Burlington Northern Pulling Out of the World
Our business plan is ready to shop around! We still have a small amount of revising to do, but I don't expect that to change as the fundraising process generates feedback. Jane is taking over the business plan tweaks while I assemble an investment offering. I use the word 'assemble' instead of 'write' because I'll be stealing most of its content from the investment documents of two other breweries.
I haven't bought any hops yet, primarily because most of the ones for sale were grown in 2007. Brewers are selling off their old stashes while the 2008 crop comes in. Properly stored year-old hops would be fine if I needed them right now, but I don't want to be using them next summer. I met with James from Gorst Valley Hops a couple of weeks ago, and it looks promising that I'll be able to buy all of my citrusy American hops from him next fall. At the risk of digressing, he's a horticulturist who's more interested in turning Wisconsin farmers onto hop growing than he is in growing them himself. His main reasons for growing them right now are to prove their worth and to test a mobile processing facility that he's building. It was pretty awesome to show him my beer list and hear him say "I can get you that" almost every time I mentioned a weird ingredient. He even knows some used equipment dealers.
It's been a while since I talked about pilot brewing. First off, my beer fridge is working again! A sloppy moisture control vs. energy efficiency switch is a much better problem to have than a fridge that's actually broken. 'Nuff said. The second mint porter tasted awesome, except when I drank it too cold. Low temperature gave it an unpleasant shaprness - I still believe a hop/mint interaction is involved, and I'll name CO2 as a suspect as well - but the beer is basically a dessert at "cool but not cold" temperatures. Despite it's warm leanings, the beer made an excellent custard float. Much better than the first batch. Reducing the beer on the stove to use as a syrup, however, did not taste good. Holy bitterness! Although I reduced the hops dramatically, the beer wasn't too sweet. I suspect the mint lends its own bitterness, which balances malt sweetness in a similar manner as hops. Next time, I'm gonna brew the beer with no hops whatsoever. I transfered the maple farmhouse ale into its serving keg on Monday, which tasted very nice in its uncarbonated state. I have a batch of pale ale in bottles as well, which will be given away at a Locksley after-party this Friday, and I brewed a batch of Belgian pumpkin ale last week for my brother's wedding. That's about it for now!
I haven't bought any hops yet, primarily because most of the ones for sale were grown in 2007. Brewers are selling off their old stashes while the 2008 crop comes in. Properly stored year-old hops would be fine if I needed them right now, but I don't want to be using them next summer. I met with James from Gorst Valley Hops a couple of weeks ago, and it looks promising that I'll be able to buy all of my citrusy American hops from him next fall. At the risk of digressing, he's a horticulturist who's more interested in turning Wisconsin farmers onto hop growing than he is in growing them himself. His main reasons for growing them right now are to prove their worth and to test a mobile processing facility that he's building. It was pretty awesome to show him my beer list and hear him say "I can get you that" almost every time I mentioned a weird ingredient. He even knows some used equipment dealers.
It's been a while since I talked about pilot brewing. First off, my beer fridge is working again! A sloppy moisture control vs. energy efficiency switch is a much better problem to have than a fridge that's actually broken. 'Nuff said. The second mint porter tasted awesome, except when I drank it too cold. Low temperature gave it an unpleasant shaprness - I still believe a hop/mint interaction is involved, and I'll name CO2 as a suspect as well - but the beer is basically a dessert at "cool but not cold" temperatures. Despite it's warm leanings, the beer made an excellent custard float. Much better than the first batch. Reducing the beer on the stove to use as a syrup, however, did not taste good. Holy bitterness! Although I reduced the hops dramatically, the beer wasn't too sweet. I suspect the mint lends its own bitterness, which balances malt sweetness in a similar manner as hops. Next time, I'm gonna brew the beer with no hops whatsoever. I transfered the maple farmhouse ale into its serving keg on Monday, which tasted very nice in its uncarbonated state. I have a batch of pale ale in bottles as well, which will be given away at a Locksley after-party this Friday, and I brewed a batch of Belgian pumpkin ale last week for my brother's wedding. That's about it for now!
Sunday, September 28, 2008
No Accountability!
I'm done with weekly accountability updates. The whole purpose of them was to keep me on track, which they aren't doing. This weblog is becoming tedious, and people who try to use it as a business resource will have a lot of useless crap to wade through from late June to late September. Setting frequent goals and reflecting on my progress is important, but the boredom of it shouldn't be yours to bear.
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Da Beers
I mentioned in my last post that I made all of my beer recipes for a year. We're probably going to start with eight taps, which will prevent individual batches from being served for too long. We'll likely have four year-round, two seasonal and two rotating beers on tap at any given time. Behold, the preliminary beer list!
Year-Round:
House Ale - the signature session beer of RePublic!
Belgian Blond
Pale Ale - we'll name it Heartattack and Bine if Tom Waits doesn't sue us.
Chocolate Porter
Spring/Summer:
Ordinary Bitter
Summer Pils
Fall/Winter:
Scottish Heavy - the name is misleading; it's a session beer.
Belgian Pumpkin - a Squashed Stereotype, if you will.
Rotating:
Grapefruit Lager - a light lager spiced with grapefruit zest.
Wildflower Belgian Pale - a restrained Belgian ale brewed with wildflower honey.
Cardamom Coffee Stout - thanks, Kevin, for the Arabic coffee idea.
Maple Biere de Garde - a farmhouse ale with unrefined Maple syrup.
Old Ale - a blend of fresh beer and stock ale that's been inoculated with Brettanomyces and aged in wine barrels.
Grand Cru, aka the Raspberry Belgianwine.
Imperial Black Lager - aged for a year before serving. Will I get dork points for naming it Gestahl's?
I'd love to brew a doppelbock, but mostly because I want to name it Lowest Common Denominator. I can't really see a doppelbock working as a pub beer, but don't rule it out.
Year-Round:
House Ale - the signature session beer of RePublic!
Belgian Blond
Pale Ale - we'll name it Heartattack and Bine if Tom Waits doesn't sue us.
Chocolate Porter
Spring/Summer:
Ordinary Bitter
Summer Pils
Fall/Winter:
Scottish Heavy - the name is misleading; it's a session beer.
Belgian Pumpkin - a Squashed Stereotype, if you will.
Rotating:
Grapefruit Lager - a light lager spiced with grapefruit zest.
Wildflower Belgian Pale - a restrained Belgian ale brewed with wildflower honey.
Cardamom Coffee Stout - thanks, Kevin, for the Arabic coffee idea.
Maple Biere de Garde - a farmhouse ale with unrefined Maple syrup.
Old Ale - a blend of fresh beer and stock ale that's been inoculated with Brettanomyces and aged in wine barrels.
Grand Cru, aka the Raspberry Belgianwine.
Imperial Black Lager - aged for a year before serving. Will I get dork points for naming it Gestahl's?
I'd love to brew a doppelbock, but mostly because I want to name it Lowest Common Denominator. I can't really see a doppelbock working as a pub beer, but don't rule it out.
Friday, September 19, 2008
Backtracking
Time that I spent updating the business plan this week: about six hours.
My deviation started on Monday, when I spent way too much time preparing cost estimates for another commercial brewer. It makes me happy that he thinks my work is thorough enough to apply to his real-world situation, but I should have gotten it done over the weekend.
I did rewrite some of the business plan on Tuesday. That afternoon, I met with an interested homebrewer to give him the lowdown on the project. He raised a lot of issues that'll be better to address now than later. The biggest is that our startup cost is going to be a turn-off to potential investors. That's what I get for thinking "I'll ask for enough to buy all new equipment, then buy as much used gear as I can and return the difference." To an investor, a 1.5-to-1 ratio of annual sales to initial capital may be acceptable but a 1-to-1 ratio may not. I'd been feeling guilty about my generalized startup costs anyway, so I dusted off the old itemized equipment list and gave it a makeover. At first, I wanted to find pieces of used equipment and plug their prices into the list. After a few hours, I realized it would take me years to estimate my costs that way. What I did instead was assume that used equipment will cost 40% of new and that I'll be able to find 50% of my equipment used, which means my expected equipment cost is 70% of all-new. There you have it: our first official business gamble.
Updating the equipment costs didn't take up very much time, but creating an entire year worth of beer recipes did. Why would I do something like that? To figure out my hop needs, silly! It's harvest time and there seem to be some hops available on the spot market (meaning they're not all going to fulfill prior contracts). A while back, New Zealand Hops told me that my chances of getting hops next spring are decent. They even thought that I could get organic hops, which is unheard of these days. The problem is that the hops in New Zealand aren't harvested until March, so I won't know where I truly stand until then - I'm still waiting for them to project their yield and give me a prediction. If I can get my grubby little hands on some hops now, I'm absolutely going to do it. If I don't and New Zealand fails to come through for me (never!), I hope you like guest beers.
Looking a little ways down the road, a future brewery owner who I met at the Craft Brewers Conference was awesome enough to send me his private placement memorandum. My legal paranoia dictates that he'll have to remain anonymous for the time being, but that document is going to be a monster help. Once the business plan is ready to shop around, I'll tailor the document for our needs and have a lawyer review it. Paying a lawyer to write one from scratch would probably cost over ten grand.
Pilot brewing continues, I still need a beer fridge, blah blah blah.
My deviation started on Monday, when I spent way too much time preparing cost estimates for another commercial brewer. It makes me happy that he thinks my work is thorough enough to apply to his real-world situation, but I should have gotten it done over the weekend.
I did rewrite some of the business plan on Tuesday. That afternoon, I met with an interested homebrewer to give him the lowdown on the project. He raised a lot of issues that'll be better to address now than later. The biggest is that our startup cost is going to be a turn-off to potential investors. That's what I get for thinking "I'll ask for enough to buy all new equipment, then buy as much used gear as I can and return the difference." To an investor, a 1.5-to-1 ratio of annual sales to initial capital may be acceptable but a 1-to-1 ratio may not. I'd been feeling guilty about my generalized startup costs anyway, so I dusted off the old itemized equipment list and gave it a makeover. At first, I wanted to find pieces of used equipment and plug their prices into the list. After a few hours, I realized it would take me years to estimate my costs that way. What I did instead was assume that used equipment will cost 40% of new and that I'll be able to find 50% of my equipment used, which means my expected equipment cost is 70% of all-new. There you have it: our first official business gamble.
Updating the equipment costs didn't take up very much time, but creating an entire year worth of beer recipes did. Why would I do something like that? To figure out my hop needs, silly! It's harvest time and there seem to be some hops available on the spot market (meaning they're not all going to fulfill prior contracts). A while back, New Zealand Hops told me that my chances of getting hops next spring are decent. They even thought that I could get organic hops, which is unheard of these days. The problem is that the hops in New Zealand aren't harvested until March, so I won't know where I truly stand until then - I'm still waiting for them to project their yield and give me a prediction. If I can get my grubby little hands on some hops now, I'm absolutely going to do it. If I don't and New Zealand fails to come through for me (never!), I hope you like guest beers.
Looking a little ways down the road, a future brewery owner who I met at the Craft Brewers Conference was awesome enough to send me his private placement memorandum. My legal paranoia dictates that he'll have to remain anonymous for the time being, but that document is going to be a monster help. Once the business plan is ready to shop around, I'll tailor the document for our needs and have a lawyer review it. Paying a lawyer to write one from scratch would probably cost over ten grand.
Pilot brewing continues, I still need a beer fridge, blah blah blah.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Logistics, Shmogistics
Madison Sourdough will sell us partially-baked loaves for slightly more than it would cost us to hire one full-time baker. We don't need to quantify ingredient costs, energy costs, staff scheduling and owner inexperience to realize the decision is a no-brainer. Randy George, you were right! I hadn't even thought of partially-baked loaves: freezing them until we need them will reduce waste and allow us to customize a delivery schedule, and the pub will still be filled with delicious bakery smells.
I spent all day yesterday at the Master Brewers Association of the Americas' Midwest Technical Conference. The event was very informative, relatively affordable (I don't have enough time right now to rant about the American Society of Brewing Chemists) and a lot of fun. As usual, I drank a healthy amount of beer and met a lot of cool people. The price of admission included a tour of New Glarus's amazing new brewery and dinner at J.T. Whitney's. I'm glad that I spent the day learning things instead of watching Michigan lose to Notre Dame. It's not gonna be my year for football.
I'm back in business plan mode. By the end of next week, I want to have the plan ready to show potential investors. Jane and I will need to do other things before we actually can, such as write a formal investment offering and make sure that we won't be breaking any laws, but we'll try to not climb those mountains before our gear is packed.
I spent all day yesterday at the Master Brewers Association of the Americas' Midwest Technical Conference. The event was very informative, relatively affordable (I don't have enough time right now to rant about the American Society of Brewing Chemists) and a lot of fun. As usual, I drank a healthy amount of beer and met a lot of cool people. The price of admission included a tour of New Glarus's amazing new brewery and dinner at J.T. Whitney's. I'm glad that I spent the day learning things instead of watching Michigan lose to Notre Dame. It's not gonna be my year for football.
I'm back in business plan mode. By the end of next week, I want to have the plan ready to show potential investors. Jane and I will need to do other things before we actually can, such as write a formal investment offering and make sure that we won't be breaking any laws, but we'll try to not climb those mountains before our gear is packed.
Sunday, September 7, 2008
Anniversary Beer
In May of 2006, I brewed a beer that's known around the house as Raspberry Belgianwine. Once a year - on our wedding anniversary - Rachel and I share a champagne bottle of it. The base beer was essentially a 5-gallon batch of "imperialized" tripel. After a couple weeks of fermentation, I added 4 lbs of raspberries and a peeled vanilla bean. The beer weighs in at 10% abv. Here's what it looked like after 4 years of marriage:
So far, the beer has tasted better every year. If the trend continues, Rachel and I will be drinking the delicious final bottle on our 13th anniversary. Brewing the beer at the pub will require a coarse filter to fully separate the beer from the fruit. It'll also cost me about $160 per keg (half-barrel) to brew, unless I can find organic raspberries for cheaper than $4.00/lb. Money and hassle, pssht. This beer WILL be brewed for commercial consumption!
In other news, it turns out that Jane only spent a week in the UK. I finished the bakery book well before she got back, but I'm still giving myself another week to research bakery logistics.
So far, the beer has tasted better every year. If the trend continues, Rachel and I will be drinking the delicious final bottle on our 13th anniversary. Brewing the beer at the pub will require a coarse filter to fully separate the beer from the fruit. It'll also cost me about $160 per keg (half-barrel) to brew, unless I can find organic raspberries for cheaper than $4.00/lb. Money and hassle, pssht. This beer WILL be brewed for commercial consumption!
In other news, it turns out that Jane only spent a week in the UK. I finished the bakery book well before she got back, but I'm still giving myself another week to research bakery logistics.
Sunday, August 31, 2008
Hash Browns
Brewing and cooking have a lot in common. My process for making hash browns at home goes something like this:
-Peel a bunch of potatoes.
-Shred the peeled potatoes into a strainer.
-Place the strainer into a huge bowl and fill with water.
-Allow the potatoes to soak for a couple of hours.
-Remove the strainer and briefly rinse the potatoes.
-Dump the bowl water and put the strainer in the bowl.
-Set the bowl in the fridge and let sit overnight.
-Pan fry the potatoes in an elaborate ritual involving oil, onions, seasoned salt and pepper.
During the soak, a bunch of white powder falls through the strainer and settles at the bottom of the bowl. The brewing angle: how much of the white stuff is potato starch and how much of it is precipitated calcium carbonate from the water reaching equilibrium with atmospheric carbon dioxide? Hmmm...
-Peel a bunch of potatoes.
-Shred the peeled potatoes into a strainer.
-Place the strainer into a huge bowl and fill with water.
-Allow the potatoes to soak for a couple of hours.
-Remove the strainer and briefly rinse the potatoes.
-Dump the bowl water and put the strainer in the bowl.
-Set the bowl in the fridge and let sit overnight.
-Pan fry the potatoes in an elaborate ritual involving oil, onions, seasoned salt and pepper.
During the soak, a bunch of white powder falls through the strainer and settles at the bottom of the bowl. The brewing angle: how much of the white stuff is potato starch and how much of it is precipitated calcium carbonate from the water reaching equilibrium with atmospheric carbon dioxide? Hmmm...
Saturday, August 30, 2008
Important Note:
Jane is doing very important research on cask ales in England right now. This requires many visits to many pubs and many many taste tests. Gathering of important scientific data, you know.
Business Banking
Did you know that business checking accounts have monthly fees? We didn't! I'd heard good things about Johnson Bank, so Jane and I talked with them about opening an account. The woman we met was extremely nice and very honest, which was awesome. She recommended that we open a money market account to hold investments until we're ready to make a lot of withdrawals, but not do so until we check out some other banks first. She admitted that bars and restaurants aren't Johnson's strong suit, emphasized how important location will be in choosing a bank (daily deposits once we're up and running), and even recommended a few banks for us to talk with. Given that my research of the restaurant industry has gone mostly as follows,
Restaurant industry: give me $500 and I'll give you a tiny clue towards solving this one problem.
Me: that's not much incentive for me to put some clothes on and leave the forest.
talking with Johnson Bank was pretty refreshing. We didn't open a checking account, but the process didn't happen without progress. Having an IRS Employer Identification Number is required to open a business checking account, so we got one.
We didn't make a hard decision on having a bakery, but we're going to proceed as though we chose 'yes'. I'm halfway through a surprisingly good book about opening a bakery, and I'm just getting to the chapters on equipment and space requirements. Those plus ingredient, labor and energy costs will give us the foundation of making a feasibility decision. I did some work on updating the business plan to include a bakery, but I still have a ways to go.
Jane will be out of town for a couple of weeks, so I'm flying solo. My plan is to finish the book and work on the logistics of a bakery-focused menu. I'll be trying to answer questions like "how much do ingredients cost? How will we transform bulk purchases into individual portions? What will our prices be? What equipment will be required for each step? How much space will it take up? How much can we expect to sell each day? How many employees will that require?" If I can get that done by the time Jane gets back, I'll be pretty excited.
The latest pilot batch is a biere de garde with maple syrup. I fermented the beer at cool temperatures with a blend of Saison Dupont yeast and a neutral American ale yeast, then warmed it up as fermentation began to slow. My goal is to keep the saison character subtle while fermenting as much of the sugar as possible. Jeff brewed the beer with me last Saturday and it's still fermenting away, which is a full 2-3 days after fermentation usually stops. My plan just might work, mwahaha!
Restaurant industry: give me $500 and I'll give you a tiny clue towards solving this one problem.
Me: that's not much incentive for me to put some clothes on and leave the forest.
talking with Johnson Bank was pretty refreshing. We didn't open a checking account, but the process didn't happen without progress. Having an IRS Employer Identification Number is required to open a business checking account, so we got one.
We didn't make a hard decision on having a bakery, but we're going to proceed as though we chose 'yes'. I'm halfway through a surprisingly good book about opening a bakery, and I'm just getting to the chapters on equipment and space requirements. Those plus ingredient, labor and energy costs will give us the foundation of making a feasibility decision. I did some work on updating the business plan to include a bakery, but I still have a ways to go.
Jane will be out of town for a couple of weeks, so I'm flying solo. My plan is to finish the book and work on the logistics of a bakery-focused menu. I'll be trying to answer questions like "how much do ingredients cost? How will we transform bulk purchases into individual portions? What will our prices be? What equipment will be required for each step? How much space will it take up? How much can we expect to sell each day? How many employees will that require?" If I can get that done by the time Jane gets back, I'll be pretty excited.
The latest pilot batch is a biere de garde with maple syrup. I fermented the beer at cool temperatures with a blend of Saison Dupont yeast and a neutral American ale yeast, then warmed it up as fermentation began to slow. My goal is to keep the saison character subtle while fermenting as much of the sugar as possible. Jeff brewed the beer with me last Saturday and it's still fermenting away, which is a full 2-3 days after fermentation usually stops. My plan just might work, mwahaha!
Sunday, August 24, 2008
Death of a Beer Fridge
My second (as in consecutive) beer fridge died last night. The light still works, but none of the moving parts turn on. I unplugged the fridge for a few hours to see if the compressor just overheated, but its status remains unchanged. I'm starting to feel like someone who keeps replacing dead pet fish instead of learning how to care for them properly. Putting fridges outside and calling the salvage company is going to become a mundane routine instead of something I'm slightly uncomfortable doing. The people who come to haul the fridges away, who I'll eventually know on a first-name basis, won't drink coffee in the morning because they'll know that I'll have some waiting.
Jane and I made a preliminary menu and outlined some of the wine types we'd like to serve last week. We decided that "full bar" is a sufficient business plan description for the spirits. It sounds like available wines change all the time, so saying "our five wines will be blah blah blah" would be silly. We also signed the operating agreement, so RePublic is more official than ever. Amidst the business plan revision, we need to open a bank account. I'm going to go ahead and make that a goal for next week, even though Jane is skipping town on Thursday for a couple of weeks.
We didn't get much farther on researching a bakery, although Tristan told us that baking is heavily influenced by the weather and Wisconsin doesn't have a very good climate for it. At least the playing field is even for local bakers.
Here's the official to-do list for next week:
-Open a bank account.
-Decide yes or no on a bakery.
-Strengthen the descriptions of kitchen and bar operations in the business plan.
That's all folks! If you're trying to get rid of a fridge with at least a 24"x24"x30" (WxDxH) cube of space - or know how to repair refrigerators and will do it for less than the cost of a cheap used fridge - let me know.
Jane and I made a preliminary menu and outlined some of the wine types we'd like to serve last week. We decided that "full bar" is a sufficient business plan description for the spirits. It sounds like available wines change all the time, so saying "our five wines will be blah blah blah" would be silly. We also signed the operating agreement, so RePublic is more official than ever. Amidst the business plan revision, we need to open a bank account. I'm going to go ahead and make that a goal for next week, even though Jane is skipping town on Thursday for a couple of weeks.
We didn't get much farther on researching a bakery, although Tristan told us that baking is heavily influenced by the weather and Wisconsin doesn't have a very good climate for it. At least the playing field is even for local bakers.
Here's the official to-do list for next week:
-Open a bank account.
-Decide yes or no on a bakery.
-Strengthen the descriptions of kitchen and bar operations in the business plan.
That's all folks! If you're trying to get rid of a fridge with at least a 24"x24"x30" (WxDxH) cube of space - or know how to repair refrigerators and will do it for less than the cost of a cheap used fridge - let me know.
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
File Sharing Season Finale
I snuck some files onto Napster RePublic when you weren't looking, including a big one: our financial projections. Note that the file doesn't say "give us money" anywhere, so all you securities lawyers can still be our friends.
Saturday, August 16, 2008
Giant Update, All
Last week was pretty busy. Here's what we did:
-Served an altbier at the pre-Great Taste brewers' dinner.
-Finalized the operating agreement.
-Discussed our plans with Peter of Potter's Crackers.
-Talked with a couple of bakers about baking our own bread.
-Brewed batch #2 of mint porter.
-Finished the rough draft of the business plan.
The altbier turned out decently. The beer was clean and crisply bitter, but I was disappointed in its malt character. When creating recipes, brewers will often use ingredients from each beer's region of origin. For example, German-made malts are typically used to brew Oktoberfests. However, the game changes when you want to use organic ingredients and not be a hypocrite by shipping thousands of pounds of malt halfway around the globe each year. For my pilot batches, I've used entirely Briess malts from nearby Chilton, WI. In general, their malts are clean-flavored and perform well in the brewhouse. So far they've been great for beers where other ingredients provide the dominant flavors, such as pale ales (hops) and Belgian ales (yeast). For beers where malt flavors are the highlight, though, I find them lacking in complexity. A large part of the problem would be solved if Briess produced organic versions of their Pilsen, pale ale and black malts. I may be giving Briess an unfair rap because their malts' subtleties might be overwhelmed by unwanted esters - it's much harder to control fermentation temperature in a home brewery than a commercial brewery. Still, it'll be pretty telling if I see better results with the international malts that I'm about to start using.
A couple months ago (I think), Peter sent me an email saying he was interested in our project and available to talk. I took him up on his offer and he gave me a lot of really good advice. I wanted to introduce him to Jane, so we met again last week. One thing he said was that he'd love to see a brewpub with a menu of light food built around an on-premise bakery. After he left, Jane and I were like "hmmm..." I'd heard that baking is very difficult in a restaurant setting, but our pub won't be a full-blown restaurant. Picture baguettes served with things like garlic butter, cheeses, fruits and sausages. Maybe some sandwiches with veggies or shaved beef and gravy. Whether we hire a baker or buy bread from a local bakery, or whether we use bread as the focus of our menu or simply as a component, I like the idea a lot.
I talked with a couple of bakers last week: Jeff Renner from Ann Arbor, MI and Randy George from Red Hen Baking Co. Jeff bakes small batches of bread in a bakery attached to his house, and is also a well-known homebrewer. Unfortunately, I never got to taste his bread while I lived in Michigan. Randy kept me fed in Vermont with the best bread I've ever eaten: my weekend ritual was to eat half of a seeded baguette with cheese and a pear, then turn the other half into two pizzas (and sometimes turn the pizzas into a delicious grinder). Both people gave me a lot of good advice, but Randy is concerned that we won't be making enough bread to justify building a bakery. We're still talking via email and I'm really interested in what else he'll have to say.
Mint porter #2 has about twice as much mint, 1/4 as much hops and about 1/3 more specialty malt than batch #1. I added the mint earlier in the boil and the beer tasted pretty good out of the kettle, which is rare. It was very dessert-like. This batch is going into bottles instead of a keg because I'm going to give a case to Matt, the aspiring hop grower we met last month. I think it's funny that he'll be getting a beer with almost no hops in it, but his girlfriend - a professional baker, mwahaha - wanted something dark to go with a rye bread.
I don't want to talk about the business plan. The rough draft is done, but we need to do a lot more research to clean it up. Industry numbers are nice for making financial projections, but writing the plan made me realize that we don't really have a plan for anything besides the beer. What kinds of food and other beverages will we serve? What will the place look and feel like? How will we hire, train and retain employees? What exactly is the competitive landscape we'll be entering, and how will we fit into it? How will we say things that we know intuitively - e.g. organic beer is a good fit for neighborhood X - without resorting to stereotypes? I'm feeling sort of overwhelmed, but I'm happy with the progress we've made in the last week.
To do next week:
-Continue to research baking logistics.
-Define a preliminary menu, wine list and bar inventory.
-Print and sign the operating agreement.
-Served an altbier at the pre-Great Taste brewers' dinner.
-Finalized the operating agreement.
-Discussed our plans with Peter of Potter's Crackers.
-Talked with a couple of bakers about baking our own bread.
-Brewed batch #2 of mint porter.
-Finished the rough draft of the business plan.
The altbier turned out decently. The beer was clean and crisply bitter, but I was disappointed in its malt character. When creating recipes, brewers will often use ingredients from each beer's region of origin. For example, German-made malts are typically used to brew Oktoberfests. However, the game changes when you want to use organic ingredients and not be a hypocrite by shipping thousands of pounds of malt halfway around the globe each year. For my pilot batches, I've used entirely Briess malts from nearby Chilton, WI. In general, their malts are clean-flavored and perform well in the brewhouse. So far they've been great for beers where other ingredients provide the dominant flavors, such as pale ales (hops) and Belgian ales (yeast). For beers where malt flavors are the highlight, though, I find them lacking in complexity. A large part of the problem would be solved if Briess produced organic versions of their Pilsen, pale ale and black malts. I may be giving Briess an unfair rap because their malts' subtleties might be overwhelmed by unwanted esters - it's much harder to control fermentation temperature in a home brewery than a commercial brewery. Still, it'll be pretty telling if I see better results with the international malts that I'm about to start using.
A couple months ago (I think), Peter sent me an email saying he was interested in our project and available to talk. I took him up on his offer and he gave me a lot of really good advice. I wanted to introduce him to Jane, so we met again last week. One thing he said was that he'd love to see a brewpub with a menu of light food built around an on-premise bakery. After he left, Jane and I were like "hmmm..." I'd heard that baking is very difficult in a restaurant setting, but our pub won't be a full-blown restaurant. Picture baguettes served with things like garlic butter, cheeses, fruits and sausages. Maybe some sandwiches with veggies or shaved beef and gravy. Whether we hire a baker or buy bread from a local bakery, or whether we use bread as the focus of our menu or simply as a component, I like the idea a lot.
I talked with a couple of bakers last week: Jeff Renner from Ann Arbor, MI and Randy George from Red Hen Baking Co. Jeff bakes small batches of bread in a bakery attached to his house, and is also a well-known homebrewer. Unfortunately, I never got to taste his bread while I lived in Michigan. Randy kept me fed in Vermont with the best bread I've ever eaten: my weekend ritual was to eat half of a seeded baguette with cheese and a pear, then turn the other half into two pizzas (and sometimes turn the pizzas into a delicious grinder). Both people gave me a lot of good advice, but Randy is concerned that we won't be making enough bread to justify building a bakery. We're still talking via email and I'm really interested in what else he'll have to say.
Mint porter #2 has about twice as much mint, 1/4 as much hops and about 1/3 more specialty malt than batch #1. I added the mint earlier in the boil and the beer tasted pretty good out of the kettle, which is rare. It was very dessert-like. This batch is going into bottles instead of a keg because I'm going to give a case to Matt, the aspiring hop grower we met last month. I think it's funny that he'll be getting a beer with almost no hops in it, but his girlfriend - a professional baker, mwahaha - wanted something dark to go with a rye bread.
I don't want to talk about the business plan. The rough draft is done, but we need to do a lot more research to clean it up. Industry numbers are nice for making financial projections, but writing the plan made me realize that we don't really have a plan for anything besides the beer. What kinds of food and other beverages will we serve? What will the place look and feel like? How will we hire, train and retain employees? What exactly is the competitive landscape we'll be entering, and how will we fit into it? How will we say things that we know intuitively - e.g. organic beer is a good fit for neighborhood X - without resorting to stereotypes? I'm feeling sort of overwhelmed, but I'm happy with the progress we've made in the last week.
To do next week:
-Continue to research baking logistics.
-Define a preliminary menu, wine list and bar inventory.
-Print and sign the operating agreement.
Wednesday, August 6, 2008
Vacation
In a prior update, I said something like "water chemistry will consume me if I work on it outside of lunch." I should have said "water chemistry will consume me if I work on it at all." It needed to be done eventually, but obsessing over it last week was poor prioritizing. The good news is that I'm done with it, and I even fixed the phosphoric acid calculations. As usual, updates are on The Taped Plastic Glasses Fan Club Homepage. The bad news is that I didn't do much with the business plan. A wholesale lack of discipline isn't my only excuse: I had to deal with a shattered car window as well. Jeff finished the operating agreement, and he's waiting for the final stamp of approval from me and Jane.
Today is the only day that I'm in the office. Rachel and I spent last weekend camping and watching Radiohead with my brother and his fiancee. The show was excellent, and we drove home from Ohio yesterday. I'll be spending the rest of the week with my friend Destiny. She's a brewer at Otter Creek, was responsible for most of my social life in Vermont, and has never been to the Great Taste. I'll be back at work on Tuesday and hope to catch up on the business plan by the end of next week.
Today is the only day that I'm in the office. Rachel and I spent last weekend camping and watching Radiohead with my brother and his fiancee. The show was excellent, and we drove home from Ohio yesterday. I'll be spending the rest of the week with my friend Destiny. She's a brewer at Otter Creek, was responsible for most of my social life in Vermont, and has never been to the Great Taste. I'll be back at work on Tuesday and hope to catch up on the business plan by the end of next week.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Slaked Lime
With all of the cold aging going on in my beer fridge, I haven't been brewing much beer lately. I put an end to that troubling trend this morning and whipped out a batch of amber ale that should quench the late summer heat in a flavorful way. I usually dose my brewing water with lactic acid to hit my target mash pH, but I tried something different today: slaked lime. A big thanks to fellow homebrewers and MHTG members Ted Gisske and Mark Garthwaite for turning me on to the idea. I'd heard about the process before, but didn't pay much attention to it because I assumed that Madison's water didn't have enough calcium to make it worthwhile. Not true! Basically, slaked lime reduces residual alkalinity by causing calcium and bicarbonate to form chalk and precipitate out of solution. The reaction will occur on its own as carbon dioxide in the water and air reach equilibrium, but it happens at the speed of my grandpa driving. Slaked lime speeds up the process to a "let the water sit overnight" rate. Before adding the lime, I added some extra calcium to the water via gypsum and calcium chloride. The process worked really well, but the big test will come in three weeks when the beer will be ready to drink. If you brew your own beer and want to give slaked lime a try, you can find it labeled as "pickling lime" in the canning supplies section of Woodman's. I added some usage calculations to the files at Geek Central as well.
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Halfway Home
It's business as usual on the business plan. I gave myself two weeks to finish a rough draft and I'd wager that I'm over halfway done. On tap this week:
-Finish the rough draft of the business plan.
-Meet with our lawyer to wrap up the operating agreement. Yup, our attorney is none other than Jeff from Madison Beer Review. I finally remembered to ask him if it's OK that we disclose said information.
-Brew an amber ale and order some ingredients for future batches.
Water chemistry! Excess alkalinity results in poor extraction efficiency (the "mileage" of malted barley) and harsh astringency. When malt and hot water are mixed, calcium and magnesium help combat alkalinity. For most beer styles, Madison's water has more alkalinity than its calcium and magnesium can handle. One method of reducing alkalinity is to add a food-grade acid to the water. Lactic and phosphoric acids are popular among brewers because they naturally exist in beer. I recently learned that phosphoric acid removes calcium from water. I can't quantify the amount, but calcium removal is usually not a good thing for brewers. Figuring out the specifics is way beyond my scope of chemistry knowledge, but I'm not going to let that stop me. I can't work on it during work hours because it'll completely consume me, but I might chip away at it during lunch breaks. How Poindexter is that? If you downloaded my water chemistry spreadsheet, ignore the part about phosphoric acid because it's horribly wrong.
-Finish the rough draft of the business plan.
-Meet with our lawyer to wrap up the operating agreement. Yup, our attorney is none other than Jeff from Madison Beer Review. I finally remembered to ask him if it's OK that we disclose said information.
-Brew an amber ale and order some ingredients for future batches.
Water chemistry! Excess alkalinity results in poor extraction efficiency (the "mileage" of malted barley) and harsh astringency. When malt and hot water are mixed, calcium and magnesium help combat alkalinity. For most beer styles, Madison's water has more alkalinity than its calcium and magnesium can handle. One method of reducing alkalinity is to add a food-grade acid to the water. Lactic and phosphoric acids are popular among brewers because they naturally exist in beer. I recently learned that phosphoric acid removes calcium from water. I can't quantify the amount, but calcium removal is usually not a good thing for brewers. Figuring out the specifics is way beyond my scope of chemistry knowledge, but I'm not going to let that stop me. I can't work on it during work hours because it'll completely consume me, but I might chip away at it during lunch breaks. How Poindexter is that? If you downloaded my water chemistry spreadsheet, ignore the part about phosphoric acid because it's horribly wrong.
Saturday, July 19, 2008
Saturday, Saturday
It turns out that I was too ambitious last week. I deviated by about 4 hours to work on water chemistry calculations, but spent the rest of the week working on my scheduled to-do list.
On the business plan front (it's kind of like a war), I installed the numbers and wrote the product descriptions. Communicating math in concise English was a lot more difficult than I expected. In addition, I kept writing things like "most brewpubs do blah blah blah" and realizing "I have no idea if that's true." As a result, I spent a lot of time doing additional research to back up my claims. I expect that trend to continue as I make my way into less familiar territory, such as the marketing plan. From here out, I'm giving myself two weeks to finish a rough draft of the business plan.
Jane and I met to review the operating plan and told our lawyer what we think. We're very close to being done.
Creme de Menthe, mixed into Edmund Fitzgerald Porter at 1/4 tsp per 3 oz of total beverage volume, had a similar mint character as the beer I brewed. I liked my version better, which surprised me because cold-steeping ingredients in alcohol (Creme de Menthe) usually results in a smoother character than boiling (my beer). Stepping up the Creme de Menthe to 1/2 tsp per 3 oz didn't really increase the "minty" flavor. Instead, it imparted a harshness that reminded me of overcarbonation due to brettanomyces (wild yeast) contamination. I found it vaguely offensive, but Rachel liked it. I now have two theories of mint beer that need to be explored:
1. Mint and hops don't like each other. Edmund Fitzgerald is a pretty hoppy porter, which may have caused the clash.
2. Mint flavor is desirable, but mint aroma is too aggressive for beer. My 5-minute boil may have driven off some of the mint's harshness, and a 15- or 20-minute boil may be even better.
On the business plan front (it's kind of like a war), I installed the numbers and wrote the product descriptions. Communicating math in concise English was a lot more difficult than I expected. In addition, I kept writing things like "most brewpubs do blah blah blah" and realizing "I have no idea if that's true." As a result, I spent a lot of time doing additional research to back up my claims. I expect that trend to continue as I make my way into less familiar territory, such as the marketing plan. From here out, I'm giving myself two weeks to finish a rough draft of the business plan.
Jane and I met to review the operating plan and told our lawyer what we think. We're very close to being done.
Creme de Menthe, mixed into Edmund Fitzgerald Porter at 1/4 tsp per 3 oz of total beverage volume, had a similar mint character as the beer I brewed. I liked my version better, which surprised me because cold-steeping ingredients in alcohol (Creme de Menthe) usually results in a smoother character than boiling (my beer). Stepping up the Creme de Menthe to 1/2 tsp per 3 oz didn't really increase the "minty" flavor. Instead, it imparted a harshness that reminded me of overcarbonation due to brettanomyces (wild yeast) contamination. I found it vaguely offensive, but Rachel liked it. I now have two theories of mint beer that need to be explored:
1. Mint and hops don't like each other. Edmund Fitzgerald is a pretty hoppy porter, which may have caused the clash.
2. Mint flavor is desirable, but mint aroma is too aggressive for beer. My 5-minute boil may have driven off some of the mint's harshness, and a 15- or 20-minute boil may be even better.
Friday, July 18, 2008
Water Treatment
I updated the recipe calculators on the dork page to improve the sections on water chemistry. I added a stand-alone water treatment file to the page, as well. The independent file is based on beer color instead of first runnings color, but the resulting difference is pretty small.
Sunday, July 13, 2008
Sunday Confessional
Done last week:
-Read the Wisconsin LLC statutes.
-Read the operating agreement and prepared some questions.
-Met with an accountant, which was very helpful.
-Walked through a potential location.
-Wrote part of the business plan.
To do this week:
-Finalize the operating agreement.
-Write a complete rough draft of the business plan.
-Tour a farm that's starting to grow hops, which also happens to be the home of Maatwerk Studio.
-Conduct a commercial porter/Creme de Menthe experiment.
Yup, I'm feeling ambitious. Hopefully it doesn't make me look too ugly.
-Read the Wisconsin LLC statutes.
-Read the operating agreement and prepared some questions.
-Met with an accountant, which was very helpful.
-Walked through a potential location.
-Wrote part of the business plan.
To do this week:
-Finalize the operating agreement.
-Write a complete rough draft of the business plan.
-Tour a farm that's starting to grow hops, which also happens to be the home of Maatwerk Studio.
-Conduct a commercial porter/Creme de Menthe experiment.
Yup, I'm feeling ambitious. Hopefully it doesn't make me look too ugly.
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Reflection (Someone Else's)
Here's a nice tribute to the public house. Who'd have thought it would be in Forbes Magazine?
Monday, July 7, 2008
Sharing is Caring
Whether or not you like mass-produced light lagers, you should at least concede that the companies who produce them are very good at what they do. If given the task of making a nearly flavorless beer that's free of defects and always tastes the same, I'd wager that most craft breweries would fail. One reason why is because the major brewing companies have access to hundreds of years of of proprietary scientific research. When craft brewing started gaining momentum some 30 years ago, many of its participants literally didn't know how to make beer. Reinventing the wheel was a collaboration between microbreweries and home brewers who, through their willingness to share information, were able to greatly narrow the knowledge gap between themselves and the large breweries in a relatively short timespan. What would it have been like if every new brewer had to start naked in the woods? A lot of the beer we currently love would probably be lousy! The quality of American craft beer has come a long way since the start of its revival, but there's still a ton of room for improvement. I'm hoping to play my part by making it easier to share information than it currently is. As a start, I set up a little download area for files that I've made. It has two pages so far: one for brewing education and one for brewery calculations. Enjoy!
Sunday, July 6, 2008
Week in Rock
I went 2.5 for 3 on my goals last week:
-Spent some time researching restaurant feasibility studies. They typically cost $500-$4500 and are meant to answer the question "can a restaurant of concept X and size Y survive at ABC Blablabla St?" We're not there yet.
-Scheduled an appointment with an accountant to review my projection methods and results, as well as answer a few specific questions.
-Left a voicemail early last week with the real estate agent in charge of a vacant bar we want to walk through, but he didn't call back. I missed the net on being persistent.
I get a little extra credit for last week, though:
-I read about half of the WI statutes on LLCs. I'll probably be the only non-attorney to ever read them all, including the people who wrote them.
-I added a lot of detail to my 5-year income projections by entering our milestone goals into my crude accounting spreadsheet. Doing so allowed me to make 5-year predictions of balance and cash flow.
Here's what I need to do this week:
-Read the operating agreement that our lawer prepared for us.
-Finish reading the WI LLC statutes and compare them with the operating agreement.
-Meet with the accountant and adjust my approach accordingly.
-Follow through with the real estate agent.
-Write some of the actual business plan! Jane is off to a good start, but the plan needs more geeky numbers. That's what I'm here for.
Word.
-Spent some time researching restaurant feasibility studies. They typically cost $500-$4500 and are meant to answer the question "can a restaurant of concept X and size Y survive at ABC Blablabla St?" We're not there yet.
-Scheduled an appointment with an accountant to review my projection methods and results, as well as answer a few specific questions.
-Left a voicemail early last week with the real estate agent in charge of a vacant bar we want to walk through, but he didn't call back. I missed the net on being persistent.
I get a little extra credit for last week, though:
-I read about half of the WI statutes on LLCs. I'll probably be the only non-attorney to ever read them all, including the people who wrote them.
-I added a lot of detail to my 5-year income projections by entering our milestone goals into my crude accounting spreadsheet. Doing so allowed me to make 5-year predictions of balance and cash flow.
Here's what I need to do this week:
-Read the operating agreement that our lawer prepared for us.
-Finish reading the WI LLC statutes and compare them with the operating agreement.
-Meet with the accountant and adjust my approach accordingly.
-Follow through with the real estate agent.
-Write some of the actual business plan! Jane is off to a good start, but the plan needs more geeky numbers. That's what I'm here for.
Word.
Monday, June 30, 2008
Barn Party
We hung a stack of business cards next to our tap at Furthermore's barn party, and a lot of them were gone by the time we left. For those of you who found this website because you resisted the urge to put the cards in your bicycle spokes: great party, huh? We met a lot of cool people, drank some delicious beer and listened to a couple of incredible bands. The party was our beer's first public appearance, and we couldn't have asked for a better debut. Feedback on the mint porter:
-Smooth, free of defects and easy to drink.
-Needs more mint, but too little was better than too much.
-One person commented that the beer was too cold. That's what I'm talkin' 'bout!
-Mixed feelings on the body and general intensity. A few people wanted less and a couple of people wanted more.
If you were at the party and have more to say about it, don't be shy! Constructive criticism will result in better beer. Anyway, tweaking this recipe is going to be fun. My first step will be to buy some commercial porter and taste it with various amounts of Creme de Menthe. In addition to allowing me to compare intensities, it'll give me some insight into what might happen if I change the way I add the mint to the beer.
-Smooth, free of defects and easy to drink.
-Needs more mint, but too little was better than too much.
-One person commented that the beer was too cold. That's what I'm talkin' 'bout!
-Mixed feelings on the body and general intensity. A few people wanted less and a couple of people wanted more.
If you were at the party and have more to say about it, don't be shy! Constructive criticism will result in better beer. Anyway, tweaking this recipe is going to be fun. My first step will be to buy some commercial porter and taste it with various amounts of Creme de Menthe. In addition to allowing me to compare intensities, it'll give me some insight into what might happen if I change the way I add the mint to the beer.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Weekly Brief Numero Uno
I'm gonna try doing these on the weekends, but I'll play a little catch-up right now.
Last week:
-May have secured a 3-year contract for organic hops. I don't want to jinx myself by revealing too much, and I'll have a better idea of where I stand in a month.
This week:
-Expanded the income statement into a 5-year forecast.
-Reviewed the first draft of our operating agreement. Mmm... 50 pages of legalese.
-Walked through a vacant restaurant. I'm not sure that I should mention specific places we're checking out, so I'll show some restraint for now.
-My beer fridge temperature is already set to 'lager', so I might as well brew a Dusseldorf Altbier tomorrow (like lagers, alts are traditionally cold-aged).
-Spread some RePublic love while partying with Furthermore and Metropolitan Brewing!
Next week:
-Do some market research to support the revenue prediction that all of my financial projections are based on. Everything I've read says "just pay for a dang feasibility study." I'll look into the merits of that next week.
-Talk with an accountant who has experience with restaurants, startups and LLCs (is that a lot to ask?) to review my pro formas before I stuff them into the business plan.
-Set up an appointment to check out another vacant bar.
Last week:
-May have secured a 3-year contract for organic hops. I don't want to jinx myself by revealing too much, and I'll have a better idea of where I stand in a month.
This week:
-Expanded the income statement into a 5-year forecast.
-Reviewed the first draft of our operating agreement. Mmm... 50 pages of legalese.
-Walked through a vacant restaurant. I'm not sure that I should mention specific places we're checking out, so I'll show some restraint for now.
-My beer fridge temperature is already set to 'lager', so I might as well brew a Dusseldorf Altbier tomorrow (like lagers, alts are traditionally cold-aged).
-Spread some RePublic love while partying with Furthermore and Metropolitan Brewing!
Next week:
-Do some market research to support the revenue prediction that all of my financial projections are based on. Everything I've read says "just pay for a dang feasibility study." I'll look into the merits of that next week.
-Talk with an accountant who has experience with restaurants, startups and LLCs (is that a lot to ask?) to review my pro formas before I stuff them into the business plan.
-Set up an appointment to check out another vacant bar.
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Public Accountability
Opening a brewery is something that I started to take seriously in August of 2006, when I reduced my hours at Whitney's to 4 days a week so I could focus on the planning process. I was pretty naive to think that I was ready to start getting specific quotes on equipment and construction, but I managed to create a generalized cost estimate of a new brewery. I wanted to open a packaging brewery at the time, but didn't have any experience working in one, so I took a temporary brewing job and spent most of 2007 at Otter Creek in Vermont. I thought that I'd have gobs of time to work on my business plan out there, but the only thing I really accomplished was deciding that bottling lines are for suckers. Working on opening a brewpub became my full-time job when I moved back to Madison at the end of December.
A former co-worker once told me "you can do it cheap, you can do it fast or you can do it right. Pick two of the three." I've definitely taken the "right and cheap" approach so far. It wasn't a big deal when I was at Whitney's because I was still making money and I wasn't dragging anyone down with me. I asked Jane to be my business partner shortly before I moved to VT, and she thought idea of owning a brewery was so cool that she put other large-scale plans on hold to do it. Thanks to guilt, planning for an opening date of "someday" became less acceptable. At least Jane is just as responsible for our timeline as I am, though. When my job in VT ended, Rachel and I decided that she'll pay the bills while I work on opening a pub. It would be more expensive than if I were to get a job, but I'd get the business started faster and we'd still have enough money to live comfortably.
Even though I'm moving faster than I was, it's tough to shake the fact that I'm still at the same place I was at in January: sitting at a computer and writing a business plan. Not that the business plan doesn't need to be written - I'll need it to convince people to give me hundreds of thousands of dollars, which will be necessary to secure a location - but it feels like I'm going slower than I actually am. The reality of the situation is that I've been working way more than 40 hours a week to do things for the business that need to be done. If Rachel wasn't able or willing to support both of us financially, it would probably take me years to catch up to where I am today. I did the same thing for Rachel while she went back to school, but I don't think she felt like as much of a mooch as I do right now. School is usually perceived as a productive activity, while working on a business from home sounds an awful lot like "free time". Opening a brewery isn't like turning homemade birthday cards into a business: it takes a lot more planning up-front and probably won't make nearly as much money in the long run :).
In an effort to speed things up, or at least convince myself that I'm working effectively, I'm going to try setting weekly goals and using this weblog to hold me publicly accountable for meeting them. Every week, I'll briefly report on what I accomplished in the previous week and what I hope to accomplish in the following week. It usually takes me a long time to write any given blog entry, so I'm not going to do it during regular working hours. I'll even try to post my updates on the same day each week, but I haven't decided which day yet. Are you ready to keep me on track?
A former co-worker once told me "you can do it cheap, you can do it fast or you can do it right. Pick two of the three." I've definitely taken the "right and cheap" approach so far. It wasn't a big deal when I was at Whitney's because I was still making money and I wasn't dragging anyone down with me. I asked Jane to be my business partner shortly before I moved to VT, and she thought idea of owning a brewery was so cool that she put other large-scale plans on hold to do it. Thanks to guilt, planning for an opening date of "someday" became less acceptable. At least Jane is just as responsible for our timeline as I am, though. When my job in VT ended, Rachel and I decided that she'll pay the bills while I work on opening a pub. It would be more expensive than if I were to get a job, but I'd get the business started faster and we'd still have enough money to live comfortably.
Even though I'm moving faster than I was, it's tough to shake the fact that I'm still at the same place I was at in January: sitting at a computer and writing a business plan. Not that the business plan doesn't need to be written - I'll need it to convince people to give me hundreds of thousands of dollars, which will be necessary to secure a location - but it feels like I'm going slower than I actually am. The reality of the situation is that I've been working way more than 40 hours a week to do things for the business that need to be done. If Rachel wasn't able or willing to support both of us financially, it would probably take me years to catch up to where I am today. I did the same thing for Rachel while she went back to school, but I don't think she felt like as much of a mooch as I do right now. School is usually perceived as a productive activity, while working on a business from home sounds an awful lot like "free time". Opening a brewery isn't like turning homemade birthday cards into a business: it takes a lot more planning up-front and probably won't make nearly as much money in the long run :).
In an effort to speed things up, or at least convince myself that I'm working effectively, I'm going to try setting weekly goals and using this weblog to hold me publicly accountable for meeting them. Every week, I'll briefly report on what I accomplished in the previous week and what I hope to accomplish in the following week. It usually takes me a long time to write any given blog entry, so I'm not going to do it during regular working hours. I'll even try to post my updates on the same day each week, but I haven't decided which day yet. Are you ready to keep me on track?
Friday, June 20, 2008
Quick Update
The crickets are taking over around here. Sorry about that! Here's what's been up the last couple of weeks:
Beer! The sour red, summer lager and mint porter are all cellaring in my basement. In case I haven't mentioned them yet, the summer lager was brewed with some grapefruit zest and the mint porter was brewed with some Corsican mint. Corsican mint is what's used to flavor Creme de Menthe, and Creme de Menthe is used to make mint chocolate chip ice cream. It's really easy to overuse mint as a brewing ingredient, so I'm glad to report that its contribution to the beer is subtle. I'd like to bump it up to a more dessert-like level, but I'll need to use a different method than the harshness-inducing late kettle addition. Like adding the liqueur straight. Yeah. If you want to try the prototype beer, come out to Furthermore's Sh*##y Barn Party on June 28th (wait for the flyer to pop up on the website). We tasted the beer in float form with some vanilla custard, but it was pretty gross. The beer's bitterness, which isn't very high on its own, absolutely had its way with the custard. It wasn't pretty, or even funny. I haven't given up on the idea, but it'll require a dedicated recipe with almost no hops.
I finally broke down and contacted the National Restaurant Association for their Restaurant Industry Operations Report, which outlines a standardized restaurant accounting system and allows me to compare my projections with median data from restaurants around the country. So far, I've done pretty well with the financial projections!
Blogger is about to shut down, so I have to end this but quick. Have a great weekend!
Beer! The sour red, summer lager and mint porter are all cellaring in my basement. In case I haven't mentioned them yet, the summer lager was brewed with some grapefruit zest and the mint porter was brewed with some Corsican mint. Corsican mint is what's used to flavor Creme de Menthe, and Creme de Menthe is used to make mint chocolate chip ice cream. It's really easy to overuse mint as a brewing ingredient, so I'm glad to report that its contribution to the beer is subtle. I'd like to bump it up to a more dessert-like level, but I'll need to use a different method than the harshness-inducing late kettle addition. Like adding the liqueur straight. Yeah. If you want to try the prototype beer, come out to Furthermore's Sh*##y Barn Party on June 28th (wait for the flyer to pop up on the website). We tasted the beer in float form with some vanilla custard, but it was pretty gross. The beer's bitterness, which isn't very high on its own, absolutely had its way with the custard. It wasn't pretty, or even funny. I haven't given up on the idea, but it'll require a dedicated recipe with almost no hops.
I finally broke down and contacted the National Restaurant Association for their Restaurant Industry Operations Report, which outlines a standardized restaurant accounting system and allows me to compare my projections with median data from restaurants around the country. So far, I've done pretty well with the financial projections!
Blogger is about to shut down, so I have to end this but quick. Have a great weekend!
Saturday, June 7, 2008
Thinkin' 'Bout Food
If I thought it would be feasible, the only thing for sale at my pub would be my beer. Brewing it, drinking it and sharing it with other people are the driving forces behind this whole process. Craft beer isn't as prolific as its media coverage seems to imply, though. Individuals may go out of their way for it, but groups of people generally demand a variety of drinks. Selling nothing but house beer might work in a bar-heavy block of NYC with lots of pub crawlers, but it wouldn't fly here. Not yet, at least. Enter Jane, who will hopefully quit her job soon so we can tell you who she is :).
The word 'brewpub' is synonymous with food, but would we really need to make it ourselves? Early in our conceptual planning, we figured we could set up a deal with someone like Glass Nickel and have our food catered, sort of like how High Noon Saloon does. I started being honest with myself, though, about why I choose certain bars over others. When I go to the Great Dane, for example, it's usually for a meal. Even though they brew great beer, I'd rarely go there if the food wasn't stand-alone good. If that's true for me, a @#$% brewer, how could I expect other people to behave differently? Selling food that's already available around town would satisfy hungry people who are already at the pub, but it probably wouldn't draw new people in.
Enter Tristan Straub. Tristan is a chef at the Maple Bluff Country Club, and had previously cooked at L'Etoile. His altar ego is SiNiK.aL.KiNiD, an artist trying to find a home for hip-hop in Madison. We're extremely impressed with his food knowledge and he's helping us figure out things like ingredient sources, recipe design and kitchen layout. We're hoping he'll stick with us for a while, and even let us pay him at some point. Right now, though, he insists on helping us out of the goodness of his heart. We'll take it!
The word 'brewpub' is synonymous with food, but would we really need to make it ourselves? Early in our conceptual planning, we figured we could set up a deal with someone like Glass Nickel and have our food catered, sort of like how High Noon Saloon does. I started being honest with myself, though, about why I choose certain bars over others. When I go to the Great Dane, for example, it's usually for a meal. Even though they brew great beer, I'd rarely go there if the food wasn't stand-alone good. If that's true for me, a @#$% brewer, how could I expect other people to behave differently? Selling food that's already available around town would satisfy hungry people who are already at the pub, but it probably wouldn't draw new people in.
Enter Tristan Straub. Tristan is a chef at the Maple Bluff Country Club, and had previously cooked at L'Etoile. His altar ego is SiNiK.aL.KiNiD, an artist trying to find a home for hip-hop in Madison. We're extremely impressed with his food knowledge and he's helping us figure out things like ingredient sources, recipe design and kitchen layout. We're hoping he'll stick with us for a while, and even let us pay him at some point. Right now, though, he insists on helping us out of the goodness of his heart. We'll take it!
Monday, May 26, 2008
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Tax Breakdown Finale
The third installment is going straight to CliffsNotes. If we assume the same things but reinvest all of the pub's income, this is what I think will happen:
-If we're taxed as a default LLC, Jane and I will each take home $22,725.62 and each of our investors will take home -$250.
-If we're taxed as an S-Corporation, Jane and I will each take home $23,395 and each of our investors will take home -$250.
-If we're taxed as a C-Corporation, Jane and I will each take home $24,645 and each of our investors will take home $0. However, the pub will lose $3,000 of its reinvestment to corporate income tax (we'll keep $17,000 instead of $20,000).
This is how I expect the first couple of years to look as we build up a cash reserve to prepare for unplanned expenses. We need to research other implications of choosing C-corporation taxation for an LLC, such as how oppressive the paperwork will be. We'll keep you posted; hopefully without all the boring math!
-If we're taxed as a default LLC, Jane and I will each take home $22,725.62 and each of our investors will take home -$250.
-If we're taxed as an S-Corporation, Jane and I will each take home $23,395 and each of our investors will take home -$250.
-If we're taxed as a C-Corporation, Jane and I will each take home $24,645 and each of our investors will take home $0. However, the pub will lose $3,000 of its reinvestment to corporate income tax (we'll keep $17,000 instead of $20,000).
This is how I expect the first couple of years to look as we build up a cash reserve to prepare for unplanned expenses. We need to research other implications of choosing C-corporation taxation for an LLC, such as how oppressive the paperwork will be. We'll keep you posted; hopefully without all the boring math!
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
Tax Breakdown, The Sequel
Boy was I wrong:
-LLC investors who aren't involved in company management don't need to pay self-employment taxes.
-Like LLCs, S-corporations don't pay income taxes. In fact, the two entities are treated almost equally for tax purposes. The only tax benefit of an S-corporation is that managing owners don't pay self-employment tax on their ownership shares of income.
-Taxation as a C-corporation is the only way for investors to avoid paying taxes on reinvested income.
The redo is below. I could still be wrong, but I'll be less wrong than before.
Jane and I each own 25% of the company and pay ourselves $40,000/yr salaries. The company makes a $20,000 profit and keeps $4,000 of it. We have 10 additional investors who each own 5% of the business. Assume that all owners are in the 25% income tax bracket and that the corporate tax rate is 15%.
Default LLC taxation:
-The company doesn't pay income tax.
-Before taxes, my income is $45,000 and my take-home pay is $44,000. I owe $6,885 in self-employment (SE) tax on my income and am allowed to deduct half of it on my income tax form, so I report an income of $41,557.50. I pay $10,389.38 in income taxes and take home $26,725.62.
-Before taxes, each non-managing investor reports $1,000 as income and takes home $800. After paying $250 in income taxes, each investor takes home $550.
S-corporation taxation:
-The company doesn't pay income tax.
-Before taxes, my income is $45,000 and my take-home pay is $44,000. I owe $6,120 in self-employment (SE) tax on my salary and am allowed to deduct half of it on my income tax form, so I report an income of $41,940. I pay $10,485 in income taxes and take home $27,395.
-Before taxes, each non-managing investor reports $1,000 as income and takes home $800. After paying $250 in income taxes, each investor takes home $550.
C-corporation taxation:
-The company reports $20,000 in income and pays $3000 in income tax. The company still reinvests $4,000, so $13,000 is distributed to investors instead of $16,000.
-Before taxes, my income and take-home pay are both $43,250. I owe $6,120 in self-employment (SE) tax on my salary and am allowed to deduct half of it on my income tax form, so I report an income of $40,190. I pay $10,047.50 in income taxes and take home $27,082.50.
-Before taxes, each non-managing investor both reports and takes home $650. After paying $162.50 in income taxes, each investor takes home $487.50.
Up next: what would happen if we reinvested all of our earnings?
-LLC investors who aren't involved in company management don't need to pay self-employment taxes.
-Like LLCs, S-corporations don't pay income taxes. In fact, the two entities are treated almost equally for tax purposes. The only tax benefit of an S-corporation is that managing owners don't pay self-employment tax on their ownership shares of income.
-Taxation as a C-corporation is the only way for investors to avoid paying taxes on reinvested income.
The redo is below. I could still be wrong, but I'll be less wrong than before.
Jane and I each own 25% of the company and pay ourselves $40,000/yr salaries. The company makes a $20,000 profit and keeps $4,000 of it. We have 10 additional investors who each own 5% of the business. Assume that all owners are in the 25% income tax bracket and that the corporate tax rate is 15%.
Default LLC taxation:
-The company doesn't pay income tax.
-Before taxes, my income is $45,000 and my take-home pay is $44,000. I owe $6,885 in self-employment (SE) tax on my income and am allowed to deduct half of it on my income tax form, so I report an income of $41,557.50. I pay $10,389.38 in income taxes and take home $26,725.62.
-Before taxes, each non-managing investor reports $1,000 as income and takes home $800. After paying $250 in income taxes, each investor takes home $550.
S-corporation taxation:
-The company doesn't pay income tax.
-Before taxes, my income is $45,000 and my take-home pay is $44,000. I owe $6,120 in self-employment (SE) tax on my salary and am allowed to deduct half of it on my income tax form, so I report an income of $41,940. I pay $10,485 in income taxes and take home $27,395.
-Before taxes, each non-managing investor reports $1,000 as income and takes home $800. After paying $250 in income taxes, each investor takes home $550.
C-corporation taxation:
-The company reports $20,000 in income and pays $3000 in income tax. The company still reinvests $4,000, so $13,000 is distributed to investors instead of $16,000.
-Before taxes, my income and take-home pay are both $43,250. I owe $6,120 in self-employment (SE) tax on my salary and am allowed to deduct half of it on my income tax form, so I report an income of $40,190. I pay $10,047.50 in income taxes and take home $27,082.50.
-Before taxes, each non-managing investor both reports and takes home $650. After paying $162.50 in income taxes, each investor takes home $487.50.
Up next: what would happen if we reinvested all of our earnings?
Monday, May 19, 2008
The beautiful liquid pictured below is a mixture of Ketel One vodka, toasted French oak chips and three days of time.
Being able to taste the woody vodka will be a nice side benefit of what I'm really up to: teaching myself how to brew sour beers.
My favorite sour beers are Flanders red ales and their derivatives, which are traditionally aged in oak barrels for 1-3 years. The oak isn't used to provide flavor, though. Its real purpose is to provide a home for souring microorganisms, aka wild yeasts and bacteria. For that reason, commercial brewers typically revive old wine barrels that don't have a lot of flavor left in them. I'm trying to strip the flavor from my wood chips by soaking them in vodka.
Why use chips instead of a barrel? The huge barrels common to commercial producers have small surface to volume ratios, which reduce the diffusion of oxygen into the beer. Too much oxygen would result in pure vinegar. Wood chips in a glass fermenter will restrict oxygen better than a small barrel, and the beer should more closely resemble what would be produced in a large barrel. I plan on using spent wine barrels to age sour beers at the pub, though. Wollersheim, are you reading this?
Being able to taste the woody vodka will be a nice side benefit of what I'm really up to: teaching myself how to brew sour beers.
My favorite sour beers are Flanders red ales and their derivatives, which are traditionally aged in oak barrels for 1-3 years. The oak isn't used to provide flavor, though. Its real purpose is to provide a home for souring microorganisms, aka wild yeasts and bacteria. For that reason, commercial brewers typically revive old wine barrels that don't have a lot of flavor left in them. I'm trying to strip the flavor from my wood chips by soaking them in vodka.
Why use chips instead of a barrel? The huge barrels common to commercial producers have small surface to volume ratios, which reduce the diffusion of oxygen into the beer. Too much oxygen would result in pure vinegar. Wood chips in a glass fermenter will restrict oxygen better than a small barrel, and the beer should more closely resemble what would be produced in a large barrel. I plan on using spent wine barrels to age sour beers at the pub, though. Wollersheim, are you reading this?
Friday, May 16, 2008
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Income Tax
Boo to that!
Jane and I met with a lawyer yesterday, and we verified that a Limited Liability Company (LLC) is going to be the best way to structure our business. Before we apply for a Federal Employee ID Number, we'll have to decide if we want our company taxed as a corporation or a partnership for income purposes. Being taxed as an S-corporation would be more attractive than a C-corporation, and I believe we can elect to be taxed as either. I might not be right, but here's my interpretation of the situation:
Suppose that Jane and I each own 25% of the company and pay ourselves $40,000/yr salaries. After paying ourselves, assume that our 2009 profits will be $20,000 and that we'll put $4,000 of it in our company reserve. If we have 10 investors who all contribute the same amount of startup capital, each of them would own 5% of the business and receive $800 of the remaining $16,000. Finally, assume that 2006 tax rates are in effect.
If taxed as a C-corporation:
-The total $20,000 income will be taxed at the corporate rate of 15%, which means that the government would take $3,000. As a result, our investors would have $13,000 to divide between them instead of $16,000.
-Jane and I would each pay a 15.3% self-employment tax on our salaries, and then pay personal income taxes on what's left.
-Each investor would pay personal income taxes for their $650 dividend. If an investor is taxed at 25%, their take-home pay would be $487.50.
-Jane and I would also owe personal income taxes on our dividends.
If taxed as an S-corporation:
-Only the $4,000 in retained earnings would be taxed at the corporate level, which would result in the company owing $600 in income taxes.
-Jane and I would each pay a 15.3% self-employment tax on our salaries, and then pay personal income taxes on what's left.
-Each investor would pay personal income taxes for their $800 dividend. If an investor is taxed at 25%, their take-home pay would be $600.
-Jane and I would also owe personal income taxes on our dividends.
If taxed as a partnership (the LLC default):
-The company doesn't pay income tax.
-Jane and I would each pay a 15.3% self-employment tax on our salaries, and then pay personal income taxes on what's left.
-Taxes on investor income are based on percentages of company income, not paid dividends. This means that earnings retained by the company are still considered investor income, and each investor would "make" $1,000 even though they would only be paid $800.
-Each investor would pay a 15.3% self-employment tax on their $1,000 income, which would be $153. Each investor would then pay personal income taxes for their remaining income of $847. If an investor is taxed at 25%, their take-home pay would be $435.25.
-Jane and I would also owe personal income taxes on our share of company income.
Under a partnership tax structure, it would be possible for the company to reinvest enough money that investors would owe more in taxes than they would earn in dividends. Ugh! I know that incorporating the business as an S-corporation would result in more paperwork than would be worthwhile, but I'm not sure about having an LLC that's taxed like an S-corporation. Jane is gonna talk with someone tonight who knows a thing or two about taxes.
Jane and I met with a lawyer yesterday, and we verified that a Limited Liability Company (LLC) is going to be the best way to structure our business. Before we apply for a Federal Employee ID Number, we'll have to decide if we want our company taxed as a corporation or a partnership for income purposes. Being taxed as an S-corporation would be more attractive than a C-corporation, and I believe we can elect to be taxed as either. I might not be right, but here's my interpretation of the situation:
Suppose that Jane and I each own 25% of the company and pay ourselves $40,000/yr salaries. After paying ourselves, assume that our 2009 profits will be $20,000 and that we'll put $4,000 of it in our company reserve. If we have 10 investors who all contribute the same amount of startup capital, each of them would own 5% of the business and receive $800 of the remaining $16,000. Finally, assume that 2006 tax rates are in effect.
If taxed as a C-corporation:
-The total $20,000 income will be taxed at the corporate rate of 15%, which means that the government would take $3,000. As a result, our investors would have $13,000 to divide between them instead of $16,000.
-Jane and I would each pay a 15.3% self-employment tax on our salaries, and then pay personal income taxes on what's left.
-Each investor would pay personal income taxes for their $650 dividend. If an investor is taxed at 25%, their take-home pay would be $487.50.
-Jane and I would also owe personal income taxes on our dividends.
If taxed as an S-corporation:
-Only the $4,000 in retained earnings would be taxed at the corporate level, which would result in the company owing $600 in income taxes.
-Jane and I would each pay a 15.3% self-employment tax on our salaries, and then pay personal income taxes on what's left.
-Each investor would pay personal income taxes for their $800 dividend. If an investor is taxed at 25%, their take-home pay would be $600.
-Jane and I would also owe personal income taxes on our dividends.
If taxed as a partnership (the LLC default):
-The company doesn't pay income tax.
-Jane and I would each pay a 15.3% self-employment tax on our salaries, and then pay personal income taxes on what's left.
-Taxes on investor income are based on percentages of company income, not paid dividends. This means that earnings retained by the company are still considered investor income, and each investor would "make" $1,000 even though they would only be paid $800.
-Each investor would pay a 15.3% self-employment tax on their $1,000 income, which would be $153. Each investor would then pay personal income taxes for their remaining income of $847. If an investor is taxed at 25%, their take-home pay would be $435.25.
-Jane and I would also owe personal income taxes on our share of company income.
Under a partnership tax structure, it would be possible for the company to reinvest enough money that investors would owe more in taxes than they would earn in dividends. Ugh! I know that incorporating the business as an S-corporation would result in more paperwork than would be worthwhile, but I'm not sure about having an LLC that's taxed like an S-corporation. Jane is gonna talk with someone tonight who knows a thing or two about taxes.
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Almost Recovered
I got back from the Craft Brewers Conference on Monday morning, but it's taken me until now to emerge from the sleep deprivation and foggy sense of bliss. Read on for the rundown.
Seminars:
Each time slot contained 4-5 presentations, so Jane and I decided that we'd get more out of the conference if we split up. For any given time slot, we picked the two most useful-sounding seminars and I went to the one that was more likely to contain lots of brewing terminology. As much as I wanted to attend the startup sessions, Jane went to them while I learned about sustainability. It ended up being a wise decision because the startup seminars focused on information that we already knew - we would've been mad if both of us sat through the same talks. All of the other seminars that we attended were excellent.
Trade Show:
We learned a ton, but there's not much to say about it - there were a bunch of booths manned by people who provide goods & services to brewers. We asked a lot of questions about how much things cost and how long they take. We also won the giant mug pictured below.
We had Lakeside Press print 500 business cards for us before the trip, and we gave out A LOT of them. What we did was similar to networking, but the people we met were way too cool to think of as business connections. That's the brewing industry: "99% asshole-free" according to Sam Calagione, the owner of Dogfish Head. It was great to catch up with old friends, as well. Way more of them were in attendance than I expected. Until now, I didn't think that my past brewing experiences - both at home and at commercial breweries - provided very much exposure. I was wrong!
We wouldn't be doing the conference justice if we didn't mention the free beer, which was everywhere:
-The welcome reception at Stone Brewing Company's extravagant facility.
-Daily, during breaks between seminars and other conference presentations.
-Every night at the resort's tiki pavilion, which featured 100 taps of beer brewed in California (pictured).
-On the complimentary shuttle rides between bars.
-Beer festival-style in the parking lot of a Karl Strauss brewery.
With so much beer provided, we only made it to one bar in San Diego: Hamilton's Tavern. It was a great bar with tons of taps and a colorful atmosphere that I can only describe as the opposite of sterile (I'm not very observant), but I'd like to go back when it's not packed with conference attendees.
Overall, we had a lot of fun and took in a lot of information. We can't wait to do it again!
Seminars:
Each time slot contained 4-5 presentations, so Jane and I decided that we'd get more out of the conference if we split up. For any given time slot, we picked the two most useful-sounding seminars and I went to the one that was more likely to contain lots of brewing terminology. As much as I wanted to attend the startup sessions, Jane went to them while I learned about sustainability. It ended up being a wise decision because the startup seminars focused on information that we already knew - we would've been mad if both of us sat through the same talks. All of the other seminars that we attended were excellent.
Trade Show:
We learned a ton, but there's not much to say about it - there were a bunch of booths manned by people who provide goods & services to brewers. We asked a lot of questions about how much things cost and how long they take. We also won the giant mug pictured below.
We had Lakeside Press print 500 business cards for us before the trip, and we gave out A LOT of them. What we did was similar to networking, but the people we met were way too cool to think of as business connections. That's the brewing industry: "99% asshole-free" according to Sam Calagione, the owner of Dogfish Head. It was great to catch up with old friends, as well. Way more of them were in attendance than I expected. Until now, I didn't think that my past brewing experiences - both at home and at commercial breweries - provided very much exposure. I was wrong!
We wouldn't be doing the conference justice if we didn't mention the free beer, which was everywhere:
-The welcome reception at Stone Brewing Company's extravagant facility.
-Daily, during breaks between seminars and other conference presentations.
-Every night at the resort's tiki pavilion, which featured 100 taps of beer brewed in California (pictured).
-On the complimentary shuttle rides between bars.
-Beer festival-style in the parking lot of a Karl Strauss brewery.
With so much beer provided, we only made it to one bar in San Diego: Hamilton's Tavern. It was a great bar with tons of taps and a colorful atmosphere that I can only describe as the opposite of sterile (I'm not very observant), but I'd like to go back when it's not packed with conference attendees.
Overall, we had a lot of fun and took in a lot of information. We can't wait to do it again!
Sunday, April 20, 2008
well, sh--
Well folks, we may be in the market for a name again here. Turns out there's a Republic Brewing Co. opening up in Austin, Tx in 2009. booooooo....... how dare they steal our name! especially since we've just handed out a hundred or so business cards at the conference with our name on it. So now we have to decide: do we change our name, or no? We were really shooting for an original name, but as we're about to start writing this business plan, it's really crunch time. What do you all think?
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Goin' Out West
We'll be in San Diego tomorrow through Sunday for the Craft Brewers Conference. This year's program includes a lot of seminars on startups and brewpubs, so we're betting our bank accounts that the information will be worthwhile. I'm excited to finally meet some equipment manufacturers and dealers at the BrewExpo trade show, as well as drink some new beer and get to know brewers from across the country.
I'm an individual member of the Brewers Association (the group who organizes the annual conference), which caused a little confusion about my registration. Most attendees are covered by their brewery memberships, which means the breweries themselves are members, so the association wasn't looking in the right place when they first tried to verify my membership. They called me to investigate, assuming that I wasn't a member, and make sure that I actually work in the brewing industry. I was amused to learn that a lot of random people try to sign up for the conference, at the non-member cost of $750, because they think it's a beer festival. That's dedication!
I'm an individual member of the Brewers Association (the group who organizes the annual conference), which caused a little confusion about my registration. Most attendees are covered by their brewery memberships, which means the breweries themselves are members, so the association wasn't looking in the right place when they first tried to verify my membership. They called me to investigate, assuming that I wasn't a member, and make sure that I actually work in the brewing industry. I was amused to learn that a lot of random people try to sign up for the conference, at the non-member cost of $750, because they think it's a beer festival. That's dedication!
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
Brewing Continues
In the last couple of weeks, we've released pilot batches of untraditional pale ale and chocolate stout to the tasting panels.
The pale:
Traditional pale ales usually fall into one of two categories: American pale ales and English pale ales. American pale ales feature loads of US-grown hops, which impart strong citrus flavors, and are fermented with yeast strains that don't produce much flavor (they result in "clean" beers). English brewers tend to hop their beers with more restraint, using floral English-grown varieties, and ferment their beers with yeasts that add noticeable levels of fruitiness. Both styles have similar colors, which are primarily derived from the use of candy-like caramel malts.
I brewed my version with a mix of German and English hops and fermented it with an English yeast. I used a small amount of caramel malt but added most of my color through the addition of roasted barley, much like the brewers of Scotland and Ireland. I added some flaked raw barley as well, hoping the extra protein would create a creamy mouthfeel. The beer received mixed reviews, which focused primarily on the hopping. As expected, some people thought it was too bitter while others found it very drinkable. What I didn't expect was that several hopheads and bitterphobes switched teams for the debate. My prognosis: the hop that I used for bittering was too harsh, but the overall hop presence was too low. The flaked barley resulted in a stable head of foam, but didn't add any creaminess.
The stout:
Before I brewed the beer, I went to the homebrew shop with a list of three English yeast strains to choose from. None of them were available and, since I'm not selling my beer, I decided to try a strain called Super High Gravity Ale yeast. It originated in England and is used to produce beers up to 25% alcohol by volume. I was aiming for about 5.6% abv with the stout, but was intrigued by the yeast manufacturer's claim that the strain produces malty regular-gravity beers. The finished beer was drinkable, but definitely had some eau de rocket fuel from unwanted esters and higher alcohols (aka fusels). That's why I'm experimenting now instead of at the pub!
The future:
I'll be brewing a gluten-free beer from sorghum extract on Wednesday and pouring a relatively full-bodied mild for some friends this weekend. The mild showed a lot of promise after primary fermentation, so this guy is excited.
The pale:
Traditional pale ales usually fall into one of two categories: American pale ales and English pale ales. American pale ales feature loads of US-grown hops, which impart strong citrus flavors, and are fermented with yeast strains that don't produce much flavor (they result in "clean" beers). English brewers tend to hop their beers with more restraint, using floral English-grown varieties, and ferment their beers with yeasts that add noticeable levels of fruitiness. Both styles have similar colors, which are primarily derived from the use of candy-like caramel malts.
I brewed my version with a mix of German and English hops and fermented it with an English yeast. I used a small amount of caramel malt but added most of my color through the addition of roasted barley, much like the brewers of Scotland and Ireland. I added some flaked raw barley as well, hoping the extra protein would create a creamy mouthfeel. The beer received mixed reviews, which focused primarily on the hopping. As expected, some people thought it was too bitter while others found it very drinkable. What I didn't expect was that several hopheads and bitterphobes switched teams for the debate. My prognosis: the hop that I used for bittering was too harsh, but the overall hop presence was too low. The flaked barley resulted in a stable head of foam, but didn't add any creaminess.
The stout:
Before I brewed the beer, I went to the homebrew shop with a list of three English yeast strains to choose from. None of them were available and, since I'm not selling my beer, I decided to try a strain called Super High Gravity Ale yeast. It originated in England and is used to produce beers up to 25% alcohol by volume. I was aiming for about 5.6% abv with the stout, but was intrigued by the yeast manufacturer's claim that the strain produces malty regular-gravity beers. The finished beer was drinkable, but definitely had some eau de rocket fuel from unwanted esters and higher alcohols (aka fusels). That's why I'm experimenting now instead of at the pub!
The future:
I'll be brewing a gluten-free beer from sorghum extract on Wednesday and pouring a relatively full-bodied mild for some friends this weekend. The mild showed a lot of promise after primary fermentation, so this guy is excited.
Thursday, March 13, 2008
RePublic Has the Bomb!
No, we're not in an arms race. The lovely metal casing to your left is the newest fermenter in my home brewery. Inside, a heap of yeast is working its magic on my third pilot batch: a chocolate stout whose ancestor won a pair of bronze medals at the 2004 National Homebrew Competition.
Meanwhile, a pale ale is maturing in my frigid basement. The recipe began its life as a creamy red ale with a healthy dose of floral hop aroma. This time around, I lightened the color and increased the bitterness. The balance of flavors will be similar to most American pale ales, but the flavors themselves will be entirely different. The beer goes on trial next week.
In business news, we spent most of the last two weeks researching licensing requirements and investment sources. We're getting pretty comfortable with our financial projections, but we need to back up our assumptions with some market research. That way, we won't destroy our credibility with phrases like "a Betty Lou cruise boat would be a great place for a brewpub."
Meanwhile, a pale ale is maturing in my frigid basement. The recipe began its life as a creamy red ale with a healthy dose of floral hop aroma. This time around, I lightened the color and increased the bitterness. The balance of flavors will be similar to most American pale ales, but the flavors themselves will be entirely different. The beer goes on trial next week.
In business news, we spent most of the last two weeks researching licensing requirements and investment sources. We're getting pretty comfortable with our financial projections, but we need to back up our assumptions with some market research. That way, we won't destroy our credibility with phrases like "a Betty Lou cruise boat would be a great place for a brewpub."
Friday, February 29, 2008
Monday, February 25, 2008
Pilot Batch #1
One of my goals is to promote session beers. Session beers have low alcohol contents and are very drinkable, meaning that a person can easily consume several of them without feeling overwhelmed. They're good beers to stick with over the course of a long drinking session, such as spending the evening at a pub. Session beers are relatively popular in the British Isles and Germany, but the resurgence of craft brewing in the states has largely relied on strong ales. So why brew session beers?
The big reason is because they naturally moderate alcohol consumption. I'm not gonna lie to you; I like having a beer in my hand. It relaxes my nerves and boosts my confidence. A session beer is a willing security blanket that won't knock me out with a sucker punch and write dirty words on my forehead. I love drinking big beers, but holding an empty glass for an hour between each pint of IPA isn't my favorite way to make a night of it. In addition, session beers are great for informal and unplanned drinking. Do you ever feel like stopping by the pub on the way home from work? Have a quick session beer, say hi to a few friends and get back to what you were doing.
That all sounds great, but why don't more people drink them here? I think it's because most brewpubs charge standard prices for them. Are you willing to repeatedly pay full-price for 3.2% abv beer? We're not going to make the same pricing mistake.
All of this background brings me to the real purpose of this post, which is to describe my first test batch. My intent was to brew a beer with a light copper color, a sweet/bitter balance that leans very slightly toward bitterness, about 3.2% abv and enough body to avoid the common watery mouthfeel of many session beers. Aside from being brewed with all organic ingredients, it's modeled after a traditional style of English ale that you can only buy on draught (as far as I know). Once the beer was ready, I had a few highly qualified sensory analysts - aka friends - try it and give me their honest thoughts. The response was very positive and the group confirmed that I accomplished most of my goals, aside from having a more dominant hop flavor than I wanted. A note to brewers: adding your last hop addition 30 minutes from the end of the boil will still result in a strong flavor. Myth busted!
The big reason is because they naturally moderate alcohol consumption. I'm not gonna lie to you; I like having a beer in my hand. It relaxes my nerves and boosts my confidence. A session beer is a willing security blanket that won't knock me out with a sucker punch and write dirty words on my forehead. I love drinking big beers, but holding an empty glass for an hour between each pint of IPA isn't my favorite way to make a night of it. In addition, session beers are great for informal and unplanned drinking. Do you ever feel like stopping by the pub on the way home from work? Have a quick session beer, say hi to a few friends and get back to what you were doing.
That all sounds great, but why don't more people drink them here? I think it's because most brewpubs charge standard prices for them. Are you willing to repeatedly pay full-price for 3.2% abv beer? We're not going to make the same pricing mistake.
All of this background brings me to the real purpose of this post, which is to describe my first test batch. My intent was to brew a beer with a light copper color, a sweet/bitter balance that leans very slightly toward bitterness, about 3.2% abv and enough body to avoid the common watery mouthfeel of many session beers. Aside from being brewed with all organic ingredients, it's modeled after a traditional style of English ale that you can only buy on draught (as far as I know). Once the beer was ready, I had a few highly qualified sensory analysts - aka friends - try it and give me their honest thoughts. The response was very positive and the group confirmed that I accomplished most of my goals, aside from having a more dominant hop flavor than I wanted. A note to brewers: adding your last hop addition 30 minutes from the end of the boil will still result in a strong flavor. Myth busted!
Saturday, February 23, 2008
Remembering the Hyphen
You will be missed.
We got a much better response to RePublic than I expected! Several folks suggested that we use it as the pub's name, and we're gonna roll with it unless we come up with something better. No alternative spelling except for the capital P - we're not opposed to the idea altogether, but it would need to have a specific meaning so we're not perceived as out-of-touch old folks trying to sound hip. Limp Bizkit!
Themed bars are tricky because they tend to engage specific people and discourage everyone else. Using the dog idea as an example, we'd need to do a lot of research to determine if the area has enough people who are both dog lovers and craft beer drinkers (mmm... Venn diagrams). Dogs are inspiring, but a lot of other beers and breweries are named after them. Unless we think of something that blows us away, we're going to avoid themes.
Up next: tasting notes from our first test batch!
We got a much better response to RePublic than I expected! Several folks suggested that we use it as the pub's name, and we're gonna roll with it unless we come up with something better. No alternative spelling except for the capital P - we're not opposed to the idea altogether, but it would need to have a specific meaning so we're not perceived as out-of-touch old folks trying to sound hip. Limp Bizkit!
Themed bars are tricky because they tend to engage specific people and discourage everyone else. Using the dog idea as an example, we'd need to do a lot of research to determine if the area has enough people who are both dog lovers and craft beer drinkers (mmm... Venn diagrams). Dogs are inspiring, but a lot of other beers and breweries are named after them. Unless we think of something that blows us away, we're going to avoid themes.
Up next: tasting notes from our first test batch!
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Coming Someday
Welcome to The Re-Public! We're a brewpub-in-planning that hopes to grace Madison, WI with our presence in the next two years.
Our goal is to be a small, neighborhood pub that happens to brew its own beer. Our food will be simple enough that we won't be mistaken for a restaurant. Expect us to buck the trend toward large, upscale brewpubs in favor of a quaint, informal gathering place for friends, family and neighbors. Organic and local ingredients will be used as much as possible, but we don't want to over-hype it. We haven't found a location yet - if something good becomes available in your area, we'll discuss it with you before committing to it - but we'd love to be within walking distance of people's homes, much like the locals of London. Hence dubbing this website The Re-Public: we hope to bring back the public house in all of its anti-glory.
The business is a partnership between two friends. Joe, a former aerospace engineer from the 'burbs of Detroit, traded a decent salary for brewing jobs at J.T. Whitney's and Otter Creek/Wolaver's. Jane Doe, a native townie whose true identity is concealed to protect her from her employer, is hoping to reverse her backwards progression of job titles: Bartender With Lots Of Experience -> Cog, Large Software Development Company.
We're still trying to decide on a name for the bar. Got any ideas?
Our goal is to be a small, neighborhood pub that happens to brew its own beer. Our food will be simple enough that we won't be mistaken for a restaurant. Expect us to buck the trend toward large, upscale brewpubs in favor of a quaint, informal gathering place for friends, family and neighbors. Organic and local ingredients will be used as much as possible, but we don't want to over-hype it. We haven't found a location yet - if something good becomes available in your area, we'll discuss it with you before committing to it - but we'd love to be within walking distance of people's homes, much like the locals of London. Hence dubbing this website The Re-Public: we hope to bring back the public house in all of its anti-glory.
The business is a partnership between two friends. Joe, a former aerospace engineer from the 'burbs of Detroit, traded a decent salary for brewing jobs at J.T. Whitney's and Otter Creek/Wolaver's. Jane Doe, a native townie whose true identity is concealed to protect her from her employer, is hoping to reverse her backwards progression of job titles: Bartender With Lots Of Experience -> Cog, Large Software Development Company.
We're still trying to decide on a name for the bar. Got any ideas?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)